«MILLER’S PYRAMID», THE «ONION MODEL», THE «PORTFOLIO METHOD», THE «ASSESSMENT ORBITS»: HOW TO EVALUATE THE PROFESSIONALITY OF A DOCTOR?

Bieliaieva O. M., Bilash S. M., Skrypnykov P. M., Lysanets Yu. V., Skrypnikova T. P., Khmil T. A., Taran Z. M.

«MILLER'S PYRAMID», THE «ONION MODEL», THE «PORTFOLIO METHOD», THE «ASSESSMENT ORBITS»: HOW TO EVALUATE THE PROFESSIONALITY OF A DOCTOR?


Show/Download

About the author:

Bieliaieva O. M., Bilash S. M., Skrypnykov P. M., Lysanets Yu. V., Skrypnikova T. P., Khmil T. A., Taran Z. M.

Heading:

CURRENT ACHIEVEMENTS AND PROSPECTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF HIGHER MEDICAL EDUCATION

Type of article:

Scientific article

Annotation:

The article focuses on the issue of assessing a doctor's professionalism, exploring various methodologies proposed by experts in medical pedagogy. Concepts such as "Miller's pyramid," the "onion model," and the "portfolio method", «assessment orbits» are thoroughly examined. Particularly highlighted is the adaptation of "Miller's pyramid" in response to the evolving focus of medical education towards fostering professionalism and shaping professional identity. The article scrutinizes perspectives advocating for the incorporation of a fifth tier into the traditional four-tier structure of "Miller's pyramid," emphasizing the attitudes, values, and behaviors indicative of a doctor's emerging professional ethos. Additionally, a succinct overview of the "onion model" is provided. The portfolio method is emphasized for its role in organizing, shaping, and facilitating continuous assessment of the educational accomplishments of medical students. The «assessment orbits» are characterized.

Tags:

«assessment orbits», «Miller's pyramid», «the onion model», «the portfolio method», doctor, medical education, professionalism

Bibliography:

  1. Miller G.E. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/ performance. Acad Med. 1990;65:63-7.
  2. Ten Cate O, Carraccio C, Damodaran A, Gofton W, Hamstra SJ, Hart DE, et al. Entrustment Decision Making: Extending Miller’s Pyramid. Acad Med. 2021;96(2):199-204. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003800.
  3. Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Steinert Y. Amending Miller’s Pyramid to Include Professional Identity Formation. Acad Med. 2016;91(2):180-5. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000913.
  4. Al-Eraky M, Marei H. A fresh look at Miller’s pyramid: assessment at the «Is» and «Do» levels. Med Educ. 2016;50(12):1253-1257. DOI: 10.1111/medu.13101.
  5. Voronenko Yu, Mintser O. Lohika vykorystannya portfolio v zabezpechenni yakosti pislyadyplomnoyi medychnoyi osvity ta bezperervnoho profesiynoho rozvytku likarya. Analitychnyy ohlyad. Medychna informatyka ta inzheneriya. 2017;3:5-13. [in Ukrainian].
  6. Fitzgerald A. Professional identity: A concept analysis. Nurs Forum. 2020;55(3):447-472. DOI: 10.1111/nuf.12450.
  7. Barnhoorn PC. Professional Identity Formation: Onions Rather Than Pyramids. Acad Med. 2016;91(3):291. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001065.
  8. Korthagen FA. In search of the essence of a good teacher: Towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teach Teach Educ. 2004;20:77-97.
  9. Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Steinert Y. In Reply to Barnhoorn. Acad Med. 2016;91(3):291. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001071.
  10. Bjerke MB, Renger R. Being smart about writing SMART objectives. Eval Program Plann. 2017;61:125-127. DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.12.009.
  11. Irby DM, Cooke M, O’Brien BC. Calls for Reform of Medical Education by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching: 1910 and 2010. Acad Med. 2010;85(2):220-227. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c88449.

Publication of the article:

«Bulletin of problems biology and medicine», 2024 Issue 2, 173, addition, 91-93 pages, index UDC 378.091.26:61]-051.86

DOI:

10.29254/2523-4110-2024-2-173/addition-91-93

Was this article helpful?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.