THE IMPACT OF VIRTUAL REALITY TECHNOLOGIES ON MICROCIRCULATION HARDWARE PARAMETERS AND PAIN SYNDROME IN SERVICEMEMBERS DURING PRE-PROSTHETIC REHABILITATION FOLLOWING TRANSFEMORAL AMPUTATIONS

Nekhanevych O. B., Krapiva D. M.

THE IMPACT OF VIRTUAL REALITY TECHNOLOGIES ON MICROCIRCULATION HARDWARE PARAMETERS AND PAIN SYNDROME IN SERVICEMEMBERS DURING PRE-PROSTHETIC REHABILITATION FOLLOWING TRANSFEMORAL AMPUTATIONS


Show/Download

About the author:

Nekhanevych O. B., Krapiva D. M.

Heading:

THERAPY AND REHABILITATION

Type of article:

Scientific article

Annotation:

The ongoing full-scale military aggression against Ukraine has led to a dramatic surge in patients with blast-related injuries, frequently resulting in transfemoral amputations. One of the most formidable challenges in pre-prosthetic rehabilitation is phantom limb pain (PLP), with a prevalence reaching 80%. PLP acts as a potent stressor that activates the sympathoadrenal system, causing persistent vasoconstriction and impaired microcirculation within the residual limb. This triggers a “pain–vasospasm–pain” vicious cycle, hindering successful prosthetic fitting. Traditional pain assessment via the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is inherently subjective, necessitating the use of objective biomarkers such as the Perfusion Index (PI). The aim of the study is to optimize rehabilitation outcomes by validating the clinical efficacy of integrating Virtual Reality (VR) technologies into physical therapy programs for PLP management and analyzing the dynamics of microcirculatory processes in patients following lower limb amputations. A prospective cohort study was conducted involving 50 men (mean age 34,5±7,56 years) with transfemoral amputations. Patient randomization was performed using AI (ChatGPT PRO). The experimental group (Group I, n=25 ) received physical therapy enhanced by VR (immersive neuromodulation), while the control group (Group II, n=25 ) followed a standard protocol. Monitoring occurred at 14, 28, and 42 days post-surgery. Objective clinical status was assessed by measuring the PI using the Masimo Set iSpO2 device, alongside subjective VAS pain scoring. Patient flow and outcomes were visualized using alluvial diagrams (SankeyMATIC). At baseline (Day 14), groups were homogeneous (p>0.05). Day 28 (the onset of active verticalization) emerged as a critical juncture; in the control group, pain scores escalated to 6.28±1.7, accompanied by vasospasm (PI dropped to 1.5). In the experimental group, VR effectively mitigated the pain peak (VAS=3.84 ±1.75) and facilitated a PI increase to 2.8. By Day 42, the VR group demonstrated stable analgesia (3.72±1.5) compared to high pain levels in the control group (5.72±1.8; p<0.0001). Sankey diagrams confirmed that 80% of VR group patients exhibited a correlation between low pain levels and high perfusion (PI>2.5). Conversely, 65% of the standard therapy group showed pain chronification and vascular dysfunction (PI<1.8). Clinical case studies confirmed the role of VR as a neurodynamic damper preventing physiological decompensation during the walking phase. The integration of VR provides effective neuromodulation, overcoming the sympathoadrenal response to pain. A direct correlation was established between VR utilization, reduced PLP intensity, and improved microcirculation. The Perfusion Index (PI) is recognized as a reliable prognostic marker for rehabilitation success. The application of this innovative program disrupts the vasospasm vicious cycle and yields an 80% improvement in outcomes compared to standard methods.

Tags:

blast injury, neuromodulation, perfusion index (PI), phantom limb pain, physical therapy, pre-prosthetic rehabilitation, transfemoral amputation, virtual reality (VR)

Bibliography:

  1. Tintle SM, Forsberg JA, Keeling JJ, Shawen SB, Potter BK. Lower extremity combat-related amputations. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2010;19(1):35-43.
  2. Limakatso K, Bedwell GJ, Madden VJ, Parker R. The prevalence and risk factors for phantom limb pain in people with amputations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0240431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240431
  3. Cohen SP, Gambel JM, Raja SN, Galvagno S. The contribution of sympathetic mechanisms to postamputation phantom and residual limb pain: a pilot study. J Pain. 2011;12(8):859-867. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2011.01.009
  4. Obolonska OY, Nekhanevych OB, Velieva SA, Barannik MO. The relevance of determining tissue perfusion in the rehabilitation of traumatic limb injuries in the servicemen. Acta Balneol. 2025;67(5):328-332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36740/abal202505102
  5. Thøgersen M, Andoh J, Milde C, Graven-Nielsen T, Flor H, Petrini L. Individualized Augmented Reality Training Reduces Phantom Pain and Cortical Reorganization in Amputees: A Proof of Concept Study. J Pain. 2020;21(11-12):1257-1269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2020.06.002
  6. Yoshimura M, Kurumadani H, Hirata J, Senoo K, Hanayama K, Sunagawa T, et al. Case Report: Virtual reality training for phantom limb pain after amputation. Front Hum Neurosci. 2023;17:1246865. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1246865
  7. Rutledge T, Velez D, Depp C, McQuaid JR, Wong G, Jones RCW, et al. A Virtual Reality Intervention for the Treatment of Phantom Limb Pain: Development and Feasibility Results. Pain Med. 2019;20(10):2051-2059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnz121
  8. Hali K, Manzo MA, Koucheki R, Wunder JS, Jenkinson RJ, Mayo AL, et al. Use of virtual reality for the management of phantom limb pain: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2024;46(4):629-636. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2023.2172222
  9. Nekhanevych O, Manin M, Tabinska S, Krapiva D, Lytvynenko S, Nekhanevych S. Otsinka mobilnosti patsiientiv pry amputatsii nyzhnoi kintsivky pislia minno-vybukhovoi travmy u fazi proteznoho trenuvannia. Fitoterapiia Chasopys. 2025;1:92-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2522-9680-2025-1-92 [in Ukrainian].
  10. Volianskyi OM, Kikh AIu. Otsinka kryteriiv yakosti reabilitatsii viiskovosluzhbovtsiv z amputovanymy nyzhnimy kintsivkamy. UJMM. 2025;6(1):72-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46847/ujmm.2025.1(6)-072 [in Ukrainian].
  11. Bernhardt J, Borschmann K, Boyd L, Carmichael ST, Corbett D, Cramer SC, et al. Moving Rehabilitation Research Forward: Developing Consensus Statements for Rehabilitation and Recovery Research. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017;31(8):694-698. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968317724290

Publication of the article:

«Bulletin of problems biology and medicine», 2026 Issue 3, 182, 508-513 pages, index UDC 617.57/.58-089.873-057.36-036.82:615.825]-07:612.13:57.089.2

DOI:

10.29254/2077-4214-2026-3-182-508-513

Was this article helpful?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.