Kolisnychenko M. O., Lokes K. P.

INFLUENCE OF THE AUGMENTATION METHOD OF THE ALVEOLAR PROCESS ON INDICATORS OF DENTAL IMPLANT STABILITY

---

Show/Download

About the author:

Kolisnychenko M. O., Lokes K. P.

Heading:

DENTISTRY

Type of article:

Scientific article

Annotation:

To prevent the development of atrophy of the alveolar process, it is possible to use types of its augmentation after the tooth extraction, which can contribute to increasing the stability of the dental implant, and as a result, to optimizing the patient's dental rehabilitation. Bone substitutes of various origins, membrane products, and their combinations can be used to replace the bone tissue defect that forms after tooth extraction. The purpose of the study: the application of the effect of different types of augmentation of the alveolar process after the removal of the mandibular molar on the level of conventional and long-term stability of the dental implant. At the time of installation of the dental implant, when determining its stability, during periotestometry, it was established that the obtained results did not have a statistically significant difference when comparing the groups. At the time of opening the dental implant, three months after the surgical stage, an increase in this indicator was noted, but in the control group, the data were not reliable. After 360 days, the level of this indicator was significantly higher than the results of the previous period of the study by 6.2%, 4.3% and 10.6%, respectively, for the first, second and third clinical groups. A statistically significant increase in the level of stability of the dental implant relative to the initial data under the conditions of augmentation of the alveolar process during tooth extraction was noted after three months when the implant was opened, and in the control group after 180 days.

Tags:

Bibliography:

1. Lokes KP, Dobrovolʹsʹka OV, Dobrovolʹsʹkyy OV, Bukhanchenko OP, Dvornyk VM, Skrypnikov PM. Bezposerednya implantatsiya v reabilitatsiyi khvoroby z urazhenym parodontom. Ukrayinsʹkyy stomatolohichnyy alʹmanakh. 2024;1:36-9. [in Ukrainian].
2. Caramello V, Zarucco L, Foster D, Boston R, Stefanovski D, Orsini JA. Equine cheek tooth extraction: Comparison of outcomes for five extraction methods. Equine Vet J. 2020;52(2):181-186. DOI: 10.1111/evj.13150.
3. Kaplun DV, Avetikov DS, Lokes KP, Sokolova NA, Boiko IV. Vdoskonalennia metodyky pidiomu ta mobilizatsii slyzovykh i slyzovo-okistnykh klaptiv u porozhnyni rota na etapakh auhmentatsii alveoliarnoho vidrostku. Eksperymentalna ta klinichna stomatolohiia. 2018;2(1):40-3. [in Ukrainian].
4. Kolesnichenko MO, Savchenko DV, Savchenko VV, Ivaniuk OS, Zhyvotovskyi IV, Yacenko PI, et al. Dynamics of changes in biochemical markers of blood serum after removal of mandibular molars and augmentation of the alveolar process. World of Medicine and Biology. 2023;1(83):96-9. DOI: 10.26724/2079-8334-2023-1-83-96-99.
5. Yu YJ, Zhu WQ, Xu LN, Ming PP, Shao SY, Qiu J. Osseointegration of titanium dental implant under fluoride exposure in rabbits: Micro-CT and histomorphometry study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019;30(10):1038-1048. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13517.
6. Gu JT, Jiao K, Li J, Yan JF, Wang KY, Wang F, et al. Polyphosphate-crosslinked collagen scaffolds for hemostasis and alveolar bone regeneration after tooth extraction. Bioact Mater. 2021;15:68-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.12.019.
7. Khattou VV, Ivanytska OS, Havryliev VM, Buhanchenko OP, Boyko IV, Lokes KP, et al. Dynamics of bone formation and osteoresorption markers in patients with postoperative mandibular bone defects. World of Medicine and Biology. 2023;4(86):167-170. DOI: 10.26724/2079-8334-2023-4-86-167-170.
8. Mardas N, Macbeth N, Donos N, Jung RE, Zuercher AN. Is alveolar ridge preservation an overtreatment? Periodontol 2000. 2023;93(1):289- 308. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12508.
9. Semenzin Rodrigues A, de Moraes Melo Neto CL, Santos Januzzi M, Dos Santos DM, Goiato MC. Correlation between Periotest value and implant stability quotient: a systematic review. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2023;69(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1515/bmt-2023-0194.
10. O’Brien C, Naughton D, Honari B, Winning L, Polyzois I. An In Vitro Evaluation of Periotest Implant Stability Measurements Taken on Implant Retained Crowns and Healing Abutments. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2024;10(3):e910. DOI: 10.1002/cre2.910.
11. Dobrovolʹsʹka OV. Vyznachennya stabilʹnosti implantativ yak obʺyektyvnyy metod prohnozuvannya ta otsinky efektyvnosti likuvannya v dentalʹniy implantolohiyi. Visnyk problem biolohiyi i medytsyny. 2019;4.1(153):311-5. DOI: 10.29254/2077-4214-2019-4-1-153-311-315. [in Ukrainian].

Publication of the article:

«Bulletin of problems biology and medicine», 2024 Issue 4, 175, 659-665 pages, index UDC 616,314-77:616.716

DOI:

10.29254/2077-4214-2024-4-175-659-665