SEX- AND AGE-RELATED FEATURES OF POSTNATAL MORPHOGENESIS AND OSSIFICATION OF THE HUMAN HAND BONES

Biriuk I. G., Khmara T. V., Marceniak I. V., Kukovs’ka I. L., Marchuk O. F.

SEX- AND AGE-RELATED FEATURES OF POSTNATAL MORPHOGENESIS AND OSSIFICATION OF THE HUMAN HAND BONES


Show/Download

About the author:

Biriuk I. G., Khmara T. V., Marceniak I. V., Kukovs’ka I. L., Marchuk O. F.

Heading:

MORPHOLOGY

Type of article:

Scientific article

Annotation:

The article presents the results of a study of age-related features of ossification of the hand bones in children as indicators of morphological differentiation and of “bone age” determination. Based on the analysis of 124 radiographs, 43 computer tomograms and 12 three-dimensional reconstructions of the skeleton of the hand in children aged from newborn to 12 years, the timing, sequence and symmetry of the appearance of ossification points in the carpal and metacarpal bones and phalanges of the fingers were established. Regularities in the dynamics of ossification were revealed; in particular, the process begins in the 1st year of life, when nuclei appear in the capitate and hook bones. Later, ossification sequentially occurs in the triquetral bone, lunate bone, scaphoid bone, trapezoid bone, trapezium bone and, lastly, pisiform bone (9-12 years). The intensity of growth and the increase in bone-nucleus size were monitored, as well as a slight physiological asymmetry in ossification (1-3 months) between the bones of the right and left hands. The results emphasize the diagnostic and prognostic value of bone age assessment as a more informative indicator of physical development compared to chronological age. It is noted that a comprehensive assessment of the body's condition requires a combination of morphological and functional research methods.

Tags:

bone age, bones, hand skeleton, ossification, ossification centers, physical development

Bibliography:

  1. Cameron N, Schell L, editors. Human growth and development. Academic Press; 2021. 592 p.
  2. Balasundaram P, Avulakunta ID. Human Growth and Development. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025.
  3. Falkner F, Tanner JM. Human Growth: Developmental Biology Prenatal Growth. Springer Science & Business Media; 2012. 518 р.
  4. Falkner F, Tanner JM. Human Growth: Postnatal Growth. Springer Science & Business Media; 2013. 634 р.
  5. Cavallo F, Mohn A, Chiarelli F, Giannini C. Evaluation of bone age in children: a mini-review. Frontiers in Pediatrics. 2021;9:580314.
  6. Prokop-Piotrkowska M, Marszałek-Dziuba K, Moszczyńska E, Szalecki M, Jurkiewicz E. Traditional and new methods of bone age assessment-an overview. Journal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology; 2021;13(3):251-262. DOI: 10.4274/jcrpe.galenos.2020.2020.0091.
  7. Creo AL, Schwenk WF 2nd. Bone Age: A Handy Tool for Pediatric Providers. Pediatrics. 2017;140(6):e20171486.
  8. Cauley JA, Shoback DM. Bone age is not just for kids. Elife. 2021;2(10):e66916. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.66916.
  9. Sotnikova-Meleshkina Z, Zinchuk O, Mikhalchuk O. Modern approaches to assessing physical development of children and adolescents. Child’s health. 2021;16(1):33-39.
  10. Wittschieber D, Hahnemann ML, Mentzel HJ. Forensic Diagnostics of the skeletal age in the living – backgrounds and methodology. In RöFo-Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren. 2024;196(03):254-261.
  11. Bhramdat HD, Daegling DJ. Mechanobiology of human pisiform formation as a model for endochondral ossification. The Anatomical Record. 2025;308(7):1851-1866. DOI: 10.1002/ar.25274.
  12. Chen S, Liu J, Xiong Y, Li W, Tang S, Zhang H, et al. Ultrasound assessment of pediatric bone age based on wrist and knee joint ossification ratios: An observational cohort study. Research Square. 2024. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5018680/v1.
  13. Pykaliuk VS, Osmanov AIu. Filo-, ontohenez orhaniv i system liudyny. Simferopol. 2011. 312 s. [in Ukrainian].
  14. Aparisi Gómez MP, Watkin S, Perry D, Simoni P, Trisolino G, Bazzocchi A. Anatomical considerations of embryology and development of the musculoskeletal system: basic notions for musculoskeletal radiologists. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2021;25(1):3-21. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1716786.
  15. Moza B, Verma M, Kumar S, Sharma P, Beniwal A, Dhiman M. Advancements in the imaging techniques for detection of skeletal pathologies: a comprehensive review. Tuijin Jishu/J Propuls Technol. 2024;45(1):645-663.
  16. Thurstans S, Sessions N, Dolan C, Sadler K, Cichon B, Isanaka S, et al. The relationship between wasting and stunting in young children: A systematic review. Maternal & Child Nutrition. 2022;18(1):e13246. DOI: 10.1111/mcn.13246.
  17. Khmara TV, Koval OA, Tsyhykalo OV, Pankiv TV, Zamorskyi II. Osoblyvosti poiavy pervynnykh tsentriv skosteninnia u liudyny. Perynatolohiia ta Pediatriia. 2024;3(99):115-23. DOI: 10.15574/PP.2024.3(99).115123. [in Ukrainian].
  18. Khmara TV, Biriuk IH, Koval OA, Komar TV, Zamorskyi II. Osoblyvosti rannoho morfohenezu kistok verkhnoi kintsivky liudyny. Materialy Mizhnarodnoi naukovoi konferentsii Biomorfolohiia sohodennia; 2024 Ver 26-27; Kyiv. Kyiv: NT AHET; 2024. s. 104-5. [in Ukrainian].

Publication of the article:

«Bulletin of problems biology and medicine», 2025 Issue 4, 179, 293-305 pages, index UDC 616.71-001.52:612.65]-053-055

DOI:

10.29254/2077-4214-2025-4-179-293-305

Was this article helpful?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.