Danyliuk M. B., Zavhorodniy C. M., Rylov A. I., Kubrak M. A.

RESULTS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT PATIENTS ELDERLY AND OLD AGE WITH PERFORATION OF STOMACH AND DUODENAL ULCER

---

Show/Download

About the author:

Danyliuk M. B., Zavhorodniy C. M., Rylov A. I., Kubrak M. A.

Heading:

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE

Type of article:

Scientific article

Annotation:

The article is devoted to the issues of gastric and duodenal ulcer perforation. Despite modern pharmacological advances in the treatment of peptic ulcer disease, the incidence of complicated ulcers remains high. This problem is especially true for elderly and senile patients. Therefore, our work aimed to evaluate the results of surgical treatment of gastric and duodenal ulcer perforation in elderly and senile patients. The study was based on the analysis of the results of both surgical treatment and perioperative conservative therapy in elderly and senile patients with gastric or duodenal ulcer perforation. The study included 65 patients with this diagnosis. Based on our analysis, we determined that surgical treatment of perforated gastric and duodenal ulcers in the elderly and senile is a difficult task. 40.0% of patients, or 26 patients, were hospitalised later than 12 hours after the onset of the disease. Such a delayed onset of the disease has a negative impact on the general condition of patients and treatment outcomes. An important factor in treating this age group is that 89.2% have comorbidities in addition to the main disease. The duration of the disease, the severity of the general condition and a significant number of comorbidities lead to a high incidence of postoperative complications - 72.3% and mortality in 38.5% of patients. In conclusion, elderly and senile patients represent a particular category of patients that requires individualised approaches and modification of treatment standards. In turn, it will improve treatment outcomes and thereby reduce the incidence of postoperative complications and mortality.

Tags:

Bibliography:

1. Ivanchov PV, Bilachenko MV. Khirurhichni spekty likuvannya hostrouskladnenykh duodenalʹnykh vyrazok. Information supplement to the magazine «GENERAL SURGERY». 2022;2:5-6. [in Ukrainian].
2. Maksymchuk DV, Mamchyn VI, Maksymchuk VD. Vybir sposobu hirurgichnogo likuvannia perforatyvnoi piloroduodenalnoi vyrazky. Kharkiv surgical school. 2021;88(1-2):8-13. DOI: 10.26779/2522-1396.2021.1-2.08. [in Ukrainian].
3. Smetcko DO, Goncharova NM, Teslenko SM, Svirepo PV, Sivozhelizov AV, Sikal MO, et al. Suchasni pogliady shcho do likuvannia perforatyvnyh piloroduodenalnyh vyrazok. Kharkiv surgical school. 2012;2(107):33-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37699/2308-7005.2.2021.06. [in Ukrainian].
4. Weledij EP. An Overview of Gastroduodenal Perforation. Front Surg. 2020;9(7):5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2020.573901.
5. Ivanchov PV, Bilachenko MV. Khirurhichne likuvannya hostroyi uskladnenykh hastroduodenalʹnykh vyrazok. Medicine today and tomorrow. 2023;92(3):7-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35339/msz.2023.92.3.ivb. [in Ukrainian].
6. Thorsen K, Soreide JA, Kvaloy JT, Glomsaker T, Soreide K. Epidemiology of perforated peptic ulcer: age- and gender-adjusted analysis of incidence and mortality. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(3):347-54. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v 19.i3.347.
7. Clinch D, Damaskos D, Di Marzo F, Di Saverio S. Duodenal ulcer perforation: A systematic literature review and narrative description of surgical techniques used to treat large duodenal defects. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021;91(4):748-58. DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000003357.
8. Sekiguchi H, Shinozaki S, Takezawa T, Osawa H, Miura Y, Lefor AK, et al. Long-term outcomes in patients with post-bulbar ulcer bleeding compared to bulbar ulcer bleeding in the duodenum. Digestion. 2022;103(2):126-32. DOI: 10.1159/000519293.
9. Danyliuk MB, Zavgorodniy SM, Rylov AI. Kubrak MA, Pertsov IV. Starecha asteniya yak predyktor tyajkosti perebigu peredoperaciinogo periodu v pacientiv pohylogo ta starechogo viku. Pathologia. 2022;3(56):189-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1237.2022.3.260273. [in Ukrainian].
10. Danyliuk MB, Zavgorodniy SM, Yareshko NO, Bachurin AV. Otsinyuvannya syndromu starechoyi asteniyi za dopomohoyu shkaly Frailty ta Edmonton frail u patsiyentiv pokhyloho ta starechoho viku v nevidkladniy abdominalʹniy khirurhiyi. Modern medical technologies. 2023;3(58):12-17. DOI: 10.34287/MMT.3(58).2023.2. [in Ukrainian].
11. Biblioteka “Zdorov’ya Ukrayiny”. Standarty ta klinichni protpcoly nadannya medychnoi dopomogy zi soecialnosti “Hirurgia”. Nakaz № 297 vid 2010 Kvit 02. Dostupno: https://www.dovidnyk.org/dir/24/130/. [in Ukrainian].
12. Smetcko DO, Goncharova NM, Teslenko SM, Svirepo PV, Sivozhelizov AV, Sikal MO, et al. Suchasni pohlyady shchodo likuvannya perforatyvnykh piloroduodenalʹnykh vyrazok. Kharkiv surgical school. 2012;2(107):33-36. [in Ukrainian].
13. Weledij EP. An Overview of Gastroduodenal Perforation. Front Surg. 2020. Nov 9;7:5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2020.573901.
14. Bilyaeva OO, Kryjevskyi, Karol IV. Prychyny nezadovilʹnykh rezulʹtativ diahnostyky perytonitu na dohospitalʹnomu etapi. Ukrainian Medical Journal. 2021;4(144):1-4. DOI: 10.32471/umj.1680-3051.144.214004. [in Ukrainian].
15. Koshurba IV, Gladkyh FV, Chyj MO. Suchasni pidkhody do likuvannya vyrazkovoyi khvoroby shlunku ta perspektyvy vykorystannya zasobiv biolohichnoyi terapiyi. Modern medical technologies. 2023;2:58-66. DOI: 10.34287/MMT.2(57).2023.10. [in Ukrainian].

Publication of the article:

«Bulletin of problems biology and medicine», 2023 Issue 4, 171, 157-166 pages, index UDC 616.33+616.342]-002.44-007.251-053.9-089.168

DOI:

10.29254/2077-4214-2023-4-171-157-166