Proshchenko O. M., Govseev D. O.

ESTIMATION OF PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE PREDICTORS AFTER HYSTERECTOMY IN MENOPAUSAL TRANSITION PERIOD

---

Show/Download

About the author:

Proshchenko O. M., Govseev D. O.

Heading:

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE

Type of article:

Scientific article

Annotation:

The article presents a statistical analysis of the data on the prognostic significance of such predictors of pelvic organ prolapse as vaginal delivery, parity, surgical or traumatic delivery, age at menopausal transition, overweight and obesity, hysterectomy, stigma of undifferentiated connective tissue dysplasia, and the rs1800012 polymorphism of the procollagen type I alpha (α) 1 COLIA1 gene. The study examined 60 patients with pelvic organ prolapse of the third and fourth degree (according to the POP-Q classification) and 60 women without pelvic floor dysfunction. We used the chi-square single-factor analysis method to assess the possible impact of each factor. To determine the combined effect of all factors on the risk of pelvic organ prolapse, binary logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratio. Results with p<0.05 were considered statistically significant. High vaginal delivery parity (OR: 2.569; 95% CI: 1.106-5.967), genetically determined undifferentiated connective tissue dysplasia (OR: 3.788; 95% CI: 1.664- 8.624), hysterectomy (OR: 2.569; 95% CI: 1.106-5.967), and age over 50 (OR: 2.380; 95% CI: 1.050-5.393) demonstrate an etiological link with the development of pelvic organ prolapse, and their combined effect increases the risk of pelvic organ prolapse.

Tags:

Bibliography:

1. Fritel X, Varnoux N, Zins M, Breart G, Ringa V. Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse at midlife, quality of life, and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Mar;113(3):609-616. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181985312.
2. Digesu GA, Chaliha C, Salvatore S, Hutchings A, Khullar V. The relationship of vaginal prolapse severity to symptoms and quality of life. BJOG. 2005;112(7):971-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00568.x.
3. Wu JM, Matthews CA, Conover MM, Pate V, Jonsson Funk M. Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(6):1201-1206. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000286.
4. Peter E. Papa Petros The Female Pelvic Floor Function, Dysfunction and Management According to the Integral Theory. 3rd ed. Springer; 2010. 352 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33664-8_1.
5. Vergeldt TF, Weemhoff M, IntHout J, Kluivers KB. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse and its recurrence: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Nov;26(11):1559-73. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-015-2695-8.
6. Cattani L, Decoene J, Page AS, Weeg N, Deprest J, Dietz HP. Pregnancy, labour and delivery as risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Jul;32(7):1623-1631. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-021-04724-y.
7. Friedman T, Eslick GD, Dietz HP. Risk factors for prolapse recurrence: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Jan;29(1):13-21. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-017-3475-4.
8. Vermeulen CKM, Veen J, Adang C, van Leijsen SAL, Coolen AWM, Bongers MY. Pelvic organ prolapse after laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with vaginal hysterectomy: the POP-UP study. Int Urogyn J. 2020;32:841-850. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04591-z.
9. Dallenbach P, Kaelin-Gambirasio I, Dubuisson JB, Boulvain M. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse repair after hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(3):625-32.
10. Akter F, Gartoulla P, Oldroyd J, Islam RM. Prevalence of, and risk factors for, symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse in Rural Bangladesh: a cross-sectional survey study. Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Nov;27(11):1753-1759. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-016-3038-0.
11. Proshchenko OM, Govseev DO. Evaluation of COLIA1 gene RS1800012 polimorphism and non-diferentiated connective tissue dysplasia as predictors of pelvic organ prolapse. Reproductive Health of Woman. 2023;5(68).
12. Schulten SFM, Claas-Quax MJ, Weemhoff M, van Eijndhoven HW, van Leijsen SA, Vergeldt TF, et al. Risk factors for primary pelvic organ prolapse and prolapse recurrence: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;227(2):192-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.ajog.2022.04.046.
13. Deprest JA, Cartwright R, Dietz HP, Brito LGO, Koch M, Allen-Brady K, et al. International Urogynecological Consultation (IUC): pathophysiology of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Jul;33(7):1699-1710. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-022-05081-0.
14. Jelovsek JE, Chagin K, Gyhagen M, Hagen S, Wilson D, Kattan MW, et al. Predicting risk of pelvic floor disorders 12 and 20 years after delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2018;218(29:222.e1-222.e19.
15. Vergeldt TF, Weemhoff M, IntHout J, Kluivers KB. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse and its recurrence: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Nov;26(11):1559-73. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-015-2695-8.
16. Leng B, Zhou Y, Du S, Liu F, Zhao L, Sun G, et al. Association between delivery mode and pelvic organ prolapse: A meta-analysis of observational studies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Apr;235:19-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.01.031.
17. Brito LGO, Pereira GMV, Moalli P, Shynlova O, Manonai J, Weintraub AY, et al. Age and/or postmenopausal status as risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse development: systematic review with meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Jan;33(1):15-29. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-021- 04953-1.
18. Quiroz LH, White DE, Juarez D, Shobeiri SA. Age effects on pelvic floor symptoms in a cohort of nulliparous patients. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012 Nov-Dec;18(6):325-8. DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e3182720255.
19. Masenga GG, Shayo BC, Rasch V. Prevalence and risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse in Kilimanjaro, Tanzania: a population based study in Tanzanian rural community. PLoS One. 2018;13(4):e0195910. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195910.

Publication of the article:

«Bulletin of problems biology and medicine», 2023 Issue 3, 170, 257-264 pages, index UDC 618.14/.15-007.43-02:[616.14-089.87:618.173]

DOI:

10.29254/2077-4214-2023-3-170-257-264