CLINICAL RESULTS OF THE STUDY OF THE CONDITION OF DENTAL RESTORATIONS

Udod O. A., Kibishauri M. V.

CLINICAL RESULTS OF THE STUDY OF THE CONDITION OF DENTAL RESTORATIONS


Show/Download

About the author:

Udod O. A., Kibishauri M. V.

Heading:

DENTISTRY

Type of article:

Scientific article

Annotation:

The article is devoted to optimization of clinical approaches to the formation of enamel edges in Black class I caries cavities on the occlusal surface of posterior teeth by applying a two-stage algorithm of direct restoration using light-activated composite resin materials. Formation of an enamel bevel in such cavities usually requires additional removal of intact dentin and enamel. Gentle preparation with preservation of these hard tissues is possible by applying the developed two-stage algorithm of direct restoration with strengthening of enamel edges with light-activated composite resin. Clinical evaluation of direct restorations of posterior teeth performed using different approaches to the formation of enamel edges was carried out at 18 and 24 months. According to clinically significant assessment criteria, which concerned the marginal fit of the material to the enamel, marginal staining at the restoration border and secondary caries, in the case of formation of enamel edges in cavities of the indicated localization using traditional approaches, 12 violations were detected in 10 restorations (23.3%) within 18 months, and 16 violations in 13 restorations (40.6%) within 24 months; when using the two-stage algorithm, significantly fewer complications were detected within the given time periods, in particular, 7 violations in 6 restorations (11.1%) and 8 violations in 7 restorations (15.2%), respectively. The results obtained in the clinical study indicate certain advantages of the developed two-stage algorithm for direct restoration of posterior teeth with Black class I cavities on the occlusal surface using light-activated composite resin materials.

Tags:

carious cavities, direct restoration, enamel beveling, occlusal surface, photocomposite, posterior teeth

Bibliography:

  1. Borg-Bartolo R, Roccuzzo A, Molinero-Mourelle P, Schimmel M, Gambetta-Tessini K, Chaurasia A, et al. Global prevalence of edentulism and dental caries in middle-aged and elderly persons: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of dentistry. 2022;127:104335. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104335.
  2. Stupnytskyi RM, Molozhanov IO, Tkachuk NM, Zvolynska AM, Bozhyk AA. Viddaleni rezultaty fotopolimernoi restavratsii moliariv. Suchasna stomatolohiia. 2020;5:16-21. DOI: 10.33295/1992-576X-2020-5-16. [in Ukrainian].
  3. Heintze SD, Loguercio AD, Hanzen TA, Reis A, Rousson V. Clinical efficacy of resin-based direct posterior restorations and glassionomer restorations – An updated meta-analysis of clinical outcome parameters. Dent Mater. 2022;38(5):e109-e135. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2021.10.018.
  4. Atmaca Y, Karadas M. Clinical comparison of high-viscosity glass-hybrid systems with a sculptable bulk-fill composite resin in different cavity types. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2024;36(8):1138-1152. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.13221.
  5. Chandrasekhar V, Rudrapati L, Badami V, Tummala M. Incremental techniques in direct composite restoration. J Conserv Dent. 2017;20(6):386-391. DOI: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_157_16.
  6. Paolone G. The Continuous Evolution of Composites for Direct Restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2022;43(2):96-98.
  7. Cadenaro M, Josic U, Maravić T, Mazzitelli C. Progress in Dental Adhesive Materials. J Dent Res. 2023;102(3):254-262. DOI: 10.1177/00220345221145673.
  8. Jäggi M, Karlin S, Zitzmann N, Rohr N. Shear bond strength of universal adhesives to human enamel and dentin. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2024;36(5):804-812. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.13204.
  9. Lakhtin YuV, Smiianov YuV. Analiz variantiv formuvannia karioznykh porozhnyn I klasu za Blekom pid fotopolimerni kompozytsiini materialy. Visnyk problem biolohii i medytsyny. 2015;3(1):359-362. [in Ukrainian].
  10. Coelho-De-Souza FH, Camargo JC, Beskow T, Balestrin MD, Klein-Júnior CA, Demarco FF. A randomized double-blind clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel: 1-year follow-up. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2012;20(2):174-9. DOI: 10.1590/S1678-77572012000200009.
  11. Lakhtin YuV, Smiianov YuV. Klinichna otsinka restavratsii pry riznomu dyzaini emalevoho kraiu karioznykh porozhnyn 1 klasu za Blekom. Visnyk problem biolohii i medytsyny. 2019;148:335-339. [in Ukrainian].
  12. Udod OA, Kibishauri MV, vynakhidnyky; DNMU, patentovlasnyk. Sposib preparuvannia karioznykh porozhnyn u bichnykh zubakh pid fotokompozytni materialy. Patent Ukrainy na korysnu model № 140480. 2020 Liutyi 25. [in Ukrainian].

Publication of the article:

«Bulletin of problems biology and medicine», 2025 Issue 1, 176, 540-548 pages, index UDC 616.314.2-036.22-089.23

DOI:

10.29254/2077-4214-2025-1-176-540-548

Was this article helpful?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.