Steblovskyi D. V., Lychman V. O., Toropov O. A., Popovych I. Yu., Ternopolska S. I.

OSTEOPLASTIC MATERIALS FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF DEFECTS AND DEFORMITIES OF THE MANDIBLE – A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

---

Show/Download

About the author:

Steblovskyi D. V., Lychman V. O., Toropov O. A., Popovych I. Yu., Ternopolska S. I.

Heading:

LITERATURE REVIEWS

Type of article:

Scientific article

Annotation:

The aim of the study is to summarise the available data characterising the manifestations, clinical course, diag- nosis and treatment of defects and deformities of the mandible. An analysis of current scientific, experimental, and clinical studies was conducted based on a review of medical literature from the Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed databases over the past 10 years. When planning reconstructive surgical interventions in the maxillofacial region, the primary goal is not only to re- store function but also to restore the anatomical integrity of the facial skull and restore the facial contours. Restoring the harmonious proportions of the facial skull is one of the key tasks in maxillofacial surgery. The choice of osteoplastic materials and methods of reconstructive surgery in the treatment of defects and defor- mities of the mandible must meet the following requirements: be as reliable as possible, restore the function of the dentition, not cause significant facial aesthetic disturbances, and have a minimal risk of complications. The correct choice of plastic replacement for a mandible defect is a complex and not yet fully resolved problem that depends on many factors and must be selected individually, taking into account the location, size of the defect, the cause of its occurrence (tumour, trauma, inflammatory processes, etc.), the patient's age, concomitant diseases, the clinic's equipment, and the surgeon's experience. A promising direction in mandible reconstruction is the replacement of significant defects with the simultaneous use of osteo-replacement material and dental implants, which allows for high-quality orthopaedic rehabilitation with improved chewing efficiency. In view of the above, improving the effectiveness and speeding up the treatment of patients with mandible de- fects and deformities is based on the correct choice of surgical intervention in each specific case, the selection of the optimal option for osteoreplacement and reconstructive materials, as well as rational prosthetics. One way to solve this problem is to replace large defects of the mandible through the simultaneous implantation of dental implants and the use of endoprostheses for the temporomandibular joint. These issues remain understud- ied and are of considerable scientific and practical interest.

Tags:

Bibliography:

1. Pohorielov MV, Danilchenko SM, Kalinkevich OV, Kalinkevich OM, Tkach GF, Bumeister VI, ta in. Materialy dlia plastyky kistkovykh defek- tiv – suchasnyi stan problemy (ohliad literatury ta rezultaty vlasnykh doslidzhen). Visnyk Sumskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriia Medytsyna. 2011;1:52-65. [in Ukrainian].
2. Ruzhytska OV. Perspektyvy vykorystannia zhyrovoho tila shcheky dlia zakryttia defektiv alveoliarnykh vidrostkiv shchelep. Klinichna Stomatolohiia. 2018;3:75-81. [in Ukrainian].
3. Tsuperiak SS, Mochalov YuO. Napriamky vdoskonalennia osteoplastychnykh materialiv dlia stomatolohii. Ohliad. Medychna nauka Ukrainy. 2022;18(4):94-105. [in Ukrainian].
4. Giannoudis PV, Dinopoulos H, Tsiridis E. Bone substitutes: an update. Injury. 2005;36(3):S20-7.
5. Albrektsson T, Johansson C. Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegration. Eur Spine J. 2001;10(2):S96-101.
6. Bauer TW, Muschler GF. Bone graft materials: an overview of the basic science. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;371:10-27.
7. Finkemeier CG. Bone-grafting and bone-graft substitutes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(3):454-64.
8. Laurencin CT, Khan Y, El-Amin SF. Bone graft substitutes. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2006;3(1):49-57.
9. Gottlow J, Nyman S, Lindhe J, Karring T, Wennström J. New attachment formation as the result of controlled tissue regeneration. J Clin Periodontol. 1984;11(8):494-503.
10. Schliephake H. Bone growth factors in maxillofacial skeletal reconstruction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;31(5):469-84.
11. Jensen OT, editor. The Sinus Bone Graft. 2nd ed. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co; 2006. 366 p.
12. Misch CM. Autogenous bone: is it still the gold standard? Implant Dent. 2010;19(5):361.
13. Delloye C, Cornu O, Druez V, Barbier O. Bone allografts: what they can offer and what they cannot. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(5):574-9.
14. Khan SN, Cammisa FP Jr, Sandhu HS, Diwan AD, Girardi FP, Lane JM. The biology of bone grafting. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005;13(1):77- 86.
15. De Long WG Jr, Einhorn TA, Koval K, McKee M, Smith W, Sanders R, et al. Bone grafts and bone graft substitutes in orthopaedic trauma surgery. A critical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(3):649-58.
16. Aro HT, Aho AJ. Clinical use of bone allografts. Ann Med. 1993;25(4):403-12.
17. Friedlaender GE. Bone grafts. The basic science rationale for clinical applications. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69(5):786-90.
18. Vaccaro AR. The role of the osteoconductive scaffold in synthetic bone graft. Orthopedics. 2002;25(5):s571-8.
19. Burchardt H. The biology of bone graft repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;174:28-42.
20. Lokes K, Kiptilyi A, Skikevych M, Steblovskyi D, Lychman V, Bilokon S, et al. Microbiological substantiation of the effectiveness of quer- citin and its combination with ethylmethylhydroxypyridine succinate in the complex treatment of odontogenic phlegmon and maxillofacial abscesses. Front Oral Health. 2024;5:1338258. DOI:10.3389/froh.2024.1338258.
21. Steblоvskyi D, Bondarenko V, Popovych I. Morfolohichne obhruntuvannia provedennia plastychnykh ta rekonstuktyvnykh operatyvnykh vtruchen u soskopodibnii diliansi. Aktualni problemy suchasnoi medytsyny: Visnyk Ukrainskoi medychnoi stomatolohichnoi akademii. 2019;19(2):138-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31718/2077-1096.19.2.138. [in Ukrainian].
22. Zandi M, Dehghan A, Talimkhani I, Rezaeian L, Mezerji MG. Morphological characteristics of reparative osteogenesis in mandibular repair with different osteoplastic materials. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2021;20(3):1-8.
23. Al-Noaman A, Rawlinson SCF. A novel bioactive glass/graphene oxide composite coating for a polyether ether ketone-based dental im- plant. Eur J Oral Sci. 2023;131(2):e12915.
24. Sprio S, Panseri S, Montesi M, Dapporto M, Ruffini A, Dozio SM, et al. Hierarchical porosity inherited by natural sources affects the mechanical and biological behaviour of bone scaffolds. Journal of the European Ceramic Society. 2020;40(4):1717-1727. 25. Tahmasebi E, Alam M, Yazdanian M, Tabyanian H, Yazdanian A, Seifalian A, et al. Current biocompatible materials in oral regeneration: a comprehensive overview of composite materials. J Mater Res Technol. 2020;9(5):11731-55.

Publication of the article:

«Bulletin of problems biology and medicine», Issue 2,177, 102-111 pages, index UDC 616.716.4-007.24-089.844-77

DOI:

10.29254/2077-4214-2025-2-177-102-111