Yakymovych D. V., Masna Z. Z.

ANALYSIS OF HARD TISSUE DENSITY INDICATORS OF PERMANENT TEETH WITH DIFFERENT LOCALIZATION

---

Show/Download

About the author:

Yakymovych D. V., Masna Z. Z.

Heading:

DENTISTRY

Type of article:

Scientific article

Annotation:

Mineral density of bones and teeth is an optimal biomarker that allows assessing their qualitative characteristics. In dental practice, dental radiography is widely used to determine the density of jawbone tissue and hard tissues of teeth. The aim of our study was to elucidate the characteristics and compare the density indicators of hard tissues of the cervical area of formed permanent teeth of different localization. To determine the density indicators of hard tissues of teeth, X-ray images of 320 intact formed permanent teeth were processed. It was found that the density of all investigated tissues of teeth of the upper jaw is higher than that of the antagonist teeth of the lower jaw. The density of enamel and dentin of teeth on the right side is higher than that of the teeth on the left side. The distribution of cement density is asymmetrical. In all quadrants, the highest density was found for dentin, and the lowest – for cement. A significant difference was established between all compared groups. The density of enamel, dentin, and cement of teeth in the upper jaw is higher than in the antagonist teeth of the lower jaw. The density of enamel and dentin of teeth on the right side is higher than in the teeth on the left side. The distribution of cement density is asymmetric.

Tags:

Bibliography:

1. Hasyuk AP, Novoselʹtseva TV, Royko NV, Pysarenko EA. Strukturno-biokhimichna orhanizatsiya dentynu. Visnyk problem biolohiyi ta medytsyny. 2014;4(3(115)):11-15. [in Ukrainian].
2. Vorobetsʹ AB, Hasyuk PA, Kostyrenko OP. Osoblyvosti strukturnoyi orhanizatsiyi navkolopulʹparnoho dentynu velykykh kutnikh zubiv zalezhno vid stati. Klinichna stomatolohiya. 2016;1:5-10. [in Ukrainian].
3. Hurtova YAM, Shnayder SA, Breus VYE, Ulʹyanov VO. Osoblyvosti khimichnoho skladu emali postiynykh ikliv lyudyny. Intehratyvna antropolohiya. 2018;2(32):48-51. [in Ukrainian].
4. Tiron OI, Kuvshynova II, Breus VYE, Todorova AV. Iyerarkhiya struktury zubnoyi emali yak osnovnyy faktor, shcho zumovlyuye anizotropiyu yiyi mekhanichnykh vlastyvostey. Intehratyvna Antropolohiya. 2017;2(30):47-52. [in Ukrainian].
5. Kovalenko VV, Tkachenko IM. Mikroelementarnyy sklad I morfolohichni osoblyvosti emali ta dentynu v zubakh iz pidvyshchenoyu stertistyu, kariyesi ta urazhennyakh tkanyn parodonta Visnyk VDNZU Ukrayinsʹka medychna stomatolohichna akademiya. 2015;15(1(49)):223-227. [in Ukrainian].
6. Hasyuk PA Hasyuk AP, Danylʹchenko SI, Hasyuk NV. Morfo- i histohenez osnovnykh stomatolohichnykh khvorob. Ternopilʹ: FOP Parkhin V.V; 2016. 104 s. [in Ukrainian].
7. Khomenko LO, Sorochenko HV. Zminy khimichnoho skladu emali postiynykh zubiv pid vplyvom suchasnykh zasobiv ekzohennoyi profilaktyky kariyesu. Klinichna stomatolohiya. 2015;1:120-124. [in Ukrainian].
8. Dakhno LO, Masna ZZ. Strukturni osoblyvosti komirkovogo vidrostka verhnioi schelepy osib zrilogo viku za danymy konusno-promenevoi komputernoi tomographii. Lviv: Kvart; 2022. 114 s. [in Ukrainian].
9.  Kukhlevsʹkyy YU, Masna Z. Konusno-promeneva kompʺyuterna tomohrafiya - instrument dlya vyvchennya rannikh anatomo-funktsionalʹnykh zmin kistkovoyi tkanyny verkhnʹoyi ta nyzhnʹoyi shchelep lyudyny. Pratsi Naukovoho tovarystva im. Shevchenka. Medychni nauky. 2018;52(1):149-155. [in Ukrainian].
10. Dakhno LO. Analiz liniynykh rozmiriv ta pokaznykiv shchilʹnosti kistkovoyi tkanyny komirkovoho vidrostka verkhnʹoyi shchelepy zhinok u vikovomu aspekti. Klinichna anatomiya ta operatyvna khirurhiya. 2016;15(3):62-68. [in Ukrainian].
11. Zabolotna II, Honzytsʹka OS. Suchasni uyavlennya pro etiopatohenez nekarioznoyi patolohiyi zubiv, shcho vynykaye pislya yikh prorizuvannya Visnyk Ukrayinsʹkoyi medychnoyi stomatolohichnoyi akademiyi. 2009;9(4):238-243. [in Ukrainian].
12. Mazur IP, Suprunovych IM. Utrata tverdykh tkanyn zubiv (nekariozni urazhennya): klinika, dyferentsialʹna diahnostyka. Ohlyad. Suchasna stomatolohiya. 2018;5:6-12. [in Ukrainian].
13. Hodovanetsʹ OI, Kotelʹban AV, Zhyrulyk YUM. Molekulyarno-henetychni determinanty rozvytku kariyesu zubiv. Medytsyna sʹohodni i zavtra. 2021;90(2):48-56. DOI: 10.35339/msz.2021.90.2.gkz. [in Ukrainian].
14. Zhu T, Huang Z, Shu X, Zhang C, Dong Z, Peng Q. Functional nanomaterials and their potentials in antibacterial treatment of dental caries. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2022;218:112761. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.112761.
15. Peumans M, Politano G, Van Meerbeek B. Treatment of noncarious cervical lesions: when, why, and how. Int J Esthet Dent. 2020;15(1):16- 42.
16. Tulek A, Mulic A, Runningen M, Lillemo J, Utheim TP, Khan Q, et al. Genetic Aspects of Dental Erosive Wear and Dental Caries. Int J Dent. 2021;2021:5566733. DOI: 10.1155/2021/5566733.
17. Matviychuk OYA. Vplyv nadlyshkovoho navantazhennya oklyuziynykh.poverkhonʹ zubiv na poyavu defektiv u pryshyykovykh dilyankakh. Ukrayinsʹkyy stomatolohichnyy alʹmanakh. 2005;3:27-31. [in Ukrainian].
18. Matviychuk OYA. Oklyuziyni porushennya yak odna z pershoprychyn vynyknennya nekarioznykh pryshyykovykh urazhenʹ. Visnyk stomatolohiyi. 2005;1: 3234. [in Ukrainian].

Publication of the article:

«Bulletin of problems biology and medicine», 2024 Issue 1, 172, 522-527 pages, index UDC 616.314.13/.14-073.75

DOI:

10.29254/2077-4214-2024-1-172-522-527