Kuz V. S.

ALLERGIC STOMATITIS IN THE USE OF COMPLETE REMOVABLE DENTURES: FEATURES OF CLINICAL COURSE AND PREVENTION

---

Show/Download

About the author:

Kuz V. S.

Heading:

LITERATURE REVIEWS

Type of article:

Scientific article

Annotation:

This article discusses the problem of the reaction of prosthetic bed tissues to complete removable laminar dentures. In manufacturing such structures, acrylic dental base materials are widely used and are often associated with allergic stomatitis. Currently, many factors are known to cause this pathological condition, but the mechanism of its occurrence is most likely associated with the immune system's response to relevant stimuli. According to the data provided by the WHO, delayed-type hypersensitivity is a group of reactions that occur 1-2 days after the body comes into contact with an allergen. Unlike other types of allergic reactions, delayed-type hypersensitivity is not associated with the production of antibodies. Delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions in the oral cavity can manifest themselves in different ways (localised or diffuse) and appear within 24-72 hours after contact with an antigen. The antigens that can cause this type of reaction are mostly exogenous (contact) allergens (in particular, methyl methacrylate) and medications. The most common clinical manifestations may include cheilitis, gingivitis, stomatitis, etc. The Patch test is the most essential part of the diagnostic process of such conditions, which indicates the onset of an allergic reaction. The results of the patch test show that the most common allergens are acrylates, some metals, composite materials, etc. The need of the Ukrainian population for complete removable dentures and the main pathogenetic mechanisms of allergic reactions are also being studied. A novelty in preventing allergic stomatitis is the manufacture of prostheses from nylon-based thermoplastic materials. This makes it possible to level the negative impact of acrylates on the mucous membrane of the prosthetic bed.

Tags:

Bibliography:

1. Paliichuk IV. Analiz vykorystannia riznykh vydiv ortopedychnykh konstruktsii ta yikh vplyv na slyzovu obolonku porozhnyny rota. Novyny stomatolohii. 2015;2:13-6. [in Ukrainian].
2. Fera MO. Analiz yakosti ortopedychnoho likuvannia patsiientiv povnymy znimnymy protezamy. Intermedical journal. 2018;2(12):61-4. [in Ukrainian].
3. Sylenko BYu, Dvornyk VM, Sylenko YuI. Stan tkanyn proteznoho lozha v patsiientiv iz proteznymy stomatytamy v protsesi ortopedychnoho likuvannia protezamy, modyfikovanymy nanomaterialamy. Ukrainskyi stomatolohichnyi almanakh. 2021;4:20-5. [in Ukrainian].
4. Sokolovska VM, Nidzelskyi MYa, Dudchenko MO. Vplyv akrylovykh plastmas na slyzovu obolonku porozhnyny rota. Dermatovenerolohyia. Kosmetolohyia. Seksopatolohyia. 2015;3-4:212-5. [in Ukrainian].
5. Bespalova OYa, ukladach. Imunolohiia ta alerholohiia. Kyiv: KPI im. Ihoria Sikorskoho; 2021. 51 s. [in Ukrainian].
6. Asharenkova O, Kopchak O, Pavlenko E, Cherniak S. Osoblyvosti etiolohii i klinichnoho perebihu pry diahnostytsi kheilitiv (klinichnyi vypadok). Visnyk stomatolohii. 2024;126(1):211-5. DOI: 10.35220/2078-8916-2024-51-1.35. [in Ukrainian].
7. Reinhart JP, Stoopler ET, Crawford GH. Oral hypersensitivity reactions. Dermatol Clin. 2020;38(4):467-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.det.2020.05.007.
8. Fletcher R, Harrison W, Crighton A. Dental material allergies and oral soft tissue reactions. Br Dent J. 2022;232(9):620-5. DOI: 10.1038/ s41415-022-4195-9.
9. Feller L, Wood NH, Khammissa RA, Lemmer J. Review: allergic contact stomatitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017;123(5):559-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2017.02.007.
10. Satanovskyi MA, Satanovskyi DM, Severynova SK, Ovcharenko EN. Klinichni osoblyvosti i pryntsypy likuvannia alerhichnoho stomatytu pid chas vykorystannia chastkovykh i povnykh znimnykh proteziv. ENO. 2020;9(3):220-3. [in Ukrainian].
11. Chopiak VV, Havryliuk AM, Zubchenko SO, Lishchuk-Iakymovych KhO, Lomikovska MP, Potomkina HO, ta in. Klinichna imunolohiia ta alerholohiia: pidruchnyk. Kyiv: VSV «Medytsyna»; 2024. 496 s. [in Ukrainian].
12. Vons BV, Chubka MB, Hroshovyi TA. Transdermalni systemy dostavky likarskykh rechovyn. Farmatsevtychnyi chasopys. 2017;2:106-12. [in Ukrainian].
13. Forkel S, Schubert S, Corvin L, Heine G, Lang CCV, Oppel E, et al. Contact allergies to dental materials in patients. Br J Dermatol. 2024;190(6):895-903. DOI: 10.1093/bjd/ljad525.
14. Stanev E, Dencheva M. Thermovisiographic study of epicutaneous testing with dental haptens in different concentrations. C. R. Acad. Bulg. Sci. 2024;77(7):978-85 DOI: 10.7546/CRABS.2024.07.04.
15. Leibiuk LV. Mekhanizmy rozvytku uskladnen pry znimnomu protezuvanni. Ukrainskyi zhurnal medytsyny, biolohii ta sportu. 2019;4(1):29- 34. [in Ukrainian].
16. Poliukhovych YI, Demkovych AYe, Bondarenko YuI, Shcherba VV, Lebid OI, Duda KM. Characteristics of base materials and acrylates used in removable prosthetics in dental practice. Medicni perspektivi. 2024;29(2):18-26. DOI: 10.26641/2307-0404.2024.2.307464.
17. Demkovych A, Kalashnikov D, Hasiuk P, Zubchenko S, Vorobets A. The influence of microbiota on the development and course of inflammatory diseases of periodontal tissues. Frontiers in Oral Health. 2023;4:1237448. DOI: 10.3389/froh.2023.1237448.
18. Craciun A, Constantiniuc M, Badea M, Pârvu A, Ispas A, Crisan M. Adverse reactions associated with dental materials. A review. International Journal of Medical Dentistry. 2019;23(3):379-90.
19. Yanishen IV, Zapara PS, Fedotova OL, Khlistun NL, Saliya LG. Study of hemodynamics of the mucous membrane of the prosthetic area atthe stages of treatment of patients with removable denturesaccording to the improved technique. Polish Med J. 2022;295:391-5.
20. Kuz VS, Tumakova OB, Kuz HM, Teslenko OI, Yerys LB. Vyhotovlennia povnykh znimnykh plastynkovykh proteziv z riznykh hrup bazysnykh materialiv ta yikh porivnialna kharakterystyka. Aktualni problemy suchasnoi medytsyny: Visnyk UMSA. 2020;20(3):55-9. [in Ukrainian].
21. Bogucki ZA, Kownacka M. Elastic dental prostheses – alternative solutions for patients using acrylic prostheses: literature review. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2018;27(10):1441-45. DOI: 10.17219/acem/70044.
22. Crawford RJ, Martin PJ. Plastics engineering. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2020. 640 p.
23. Korol DM, Toncheva KD, Kozak RV, Kalashnikov DV, Zubchenko SH, Odzhubeiska OD. Zahalni pryntsypy planuvannia ta tekhnolohiia vyhotovlennia znimnykh proteziv: navch. posib. Poltava: PP Astraia; 2022. 230 s. [in Ukrainian].
24. Gradinaru I, Antohe ME, Hurjui LL. Biomaterials used in oral rehabilitation of the edentulous allergic patients. Romanian Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2019;10(1):114-9.
25. Gradinaru I, Hurjui LL, Ciocan-Pendefunda A, Tarniceriu CC, Antohe M-E. Flexible removable prostheses, a viable alternative to partial edentulousness rehabilitation? Romanian Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2022;14(1):185-94.
26. Can A, Karabacak DE, Yalcin BK, Demir S, Buyukozturk S, Colakoglu B, et al. How important is patch testing with dental materials in reallife clinical practice? Allergy Asthma Proc. 2023;44(2):136-44. DOI: 10.2500/aap. 2023.44.220074.

Publication of the article:

«Bulletin of problems biology and medicine», 2025 Issue 1, 176, 62-68 pages, index UDC 616.31-002-056.3-089.28

DOI:

10.29254/2077-4214-2025-1-176-62-68