Udod O. A., Tsentilo V. H., Adamenko O. M.

LITERATURE REVIEWS

Scentific article

In present-day dentistry, the photo-cured composite materials are widely used for aesthetic dental restorations. There is a wide choice of photo-cured composite materials, which differ significantly in physical and working properties, as well as the technique of their application. Most of the modern photo-cured composite materials contain the light-sensitive catalyst camphorquinone, but lucerin and 1-phenyl-1,2-propanedione are also used as photoinitiators. The important condition for photocured composite materials polymerization is that it begins and is prolonged when the intensity of the light flux is acceptable to maintain the excited state of the photoinitiator. The polymerization process is accompanied by stress, which results in polymerization shrinkage. The various approaches are used to prevent the negative consequences, namely, “directed” polymerization, the effect of the light flux according to the “soft start”, pulsating and honeycomb polymerization. The lifetime of dental restorations is directly associated with the technical characteristics of photo-cured composite materials, among which there are halogen, LED, laser and plasma ones. The main features of halogen photopolymerizers include the wide range of rays, which creates the ability to polymerize composites with photoinitiator, different to camphorquinone, with significant amount of heat, and high power consumption. However, after the thermal exposure, the mechanical characteristics of photo-cured composites, in particular, plasticity and strength deteriorate significantly; the uneven polymerization of the material occurs, which leads to the local internal stresses and deformations. Halogen photopolymerizers are rarely used recently. In LED photopolymerizers, light is generated in a semiconductor crystal due to the energy of excited electrons. In the spectrum of the luminous flux of the LED photopolymerizer the thermal and ultraviolet components are absent, all the energy is in the range of blue light, which prevents the possibility of significant overheating of hard tissues and dental pulp. The disadvantages of LED photopolymerizers include the possibility of their application only for photo-cured composite materials polymerization, where only camphorquinone appears to be the photoinitiator as well as the high degree of emitted luminous flux dispersion. The important advantage is the stability of the light flux in time and the possibility of wireless structures application. LED photopolymerizers are used in clinical practice more often. In laser photopolymerization devices light is generated by transition of electrons in gas environment of argon from the unstable to stable state. The short exposure time of photo-cured composite material portion (2-3 sec) is the important property of laser photopolymerizers, but it is also the negative factor for the occurrence of polymerization stress in material, the high energy flux turns into a high level of stress in material without providing the corresponding mechanical characteristics and significant degree of conversion. Laser photopolymerizers also emit a significant amount of heat. The widespread clinical application of these devices is limited. Plasma photopolymerizers generate a rather bright light flux due to the high-voltage arc located between two electrodes in a medium of highly rarefied ionized gas. The source of bright light flux is xenon or argon lamp. Their advantages include the possibility of application with photo-cured composite materials containing various photoinitiators, but plasma photopolymerizers are bulky and uncomfortable in use, they have large thermal radiation, they are short-lived. Thus, there is a wide choice of restorative photo-cured composite materials and significant number of photopolymerization agents used for hardening of these materials during the dental restorations. It became possible due to significant advances in dental materials technology and engineering as well as restoration technologies. However, the application of certain materials and devices with definite characteristics in a particular clinical case requires numerous laboratory investigations and long-term clinical studies.

dental restoration, photo-cured composite materials, light polymerization

1. Radlins’kyy S. Polimeryzatsiynoho stres v ob’yemnykh restavratsiyakh. Suchasna stomatolohiya. 2010;4:34-9. [in Russiаn].
2. Udod OA, Khachaturova KM, Hadzhiyeva IM. Vtrata intensivnosti svitlovoho potoku u tverdykh tkanynakh zubiv y materialakh, chto tverdiyut’ pid diyeyu svitla. Ukrayins’kyy stomatolohichnyy al’manakh. 2012;5:115-7. [in Ukrainian].
3. David C Sarrett. Restorative Materials. ADA Professional Product Review. Spring. 2010;5(2).
4. Rodrigues Junior SA, Pin LF, Machado G, Della Bona A, Demarco FF. Influence of different restorative techniques on marginal seal of class II composite restorations. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010 Jan Feb;18(1):37-43.
5. Burgess J, Cakir D. Comparative properties of low shrinkage composite resins. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2010 May;31(2):10-5.
6. Fylypchyk IS, Danylevych OV, Zhukova OO. Pomylky i uskladnennya pry vykorystanni fotopolimernykh plombuval’nykh materialiv i metody yikh usunennya. Ukr. stomatolohiyi. 2008;2:43. [in Ukrainian].
7. Blokhina A. Varianty resheniya aktual’noy problemy vosstanovleniya polostey v bokovykh zubakh. DentArt. 2012;1:52-7. [in Russiаn].
8. Jean-Francois Roulet, Guido Vanherle. Adgezivnyye tekhnologii v esteticheskoy stomatologii: per. s angl. Moskva: MEDpress-inform; 2010. s. 200. [in Russiаn].
9. Yudina NA, Ishin NN, Hrintsevich IB, Manyuk ON. Metodyka zastosuvannya fotopolimeryzatsiyni prystroyiv pry restavratsiyi tverdykh tkanyn zubiv: instruktsiya iz zastosuvannya №065-0609: zatv. MOZ RB 17.09.2009. Mins’k: BelMAPO; 2009. 11 s. [in Ukrainian].
10. Van Dijken JW. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C factor cavities: a 12 year follow up. J. Dent. 2010 Jun;38(6):469-74.
11. Udod OA, Khachaturova KM. Osoblyvosti tekhniky svitlovoho vplyvu na svetootverzhdaemye materialy v riznykh klinichnykh sytuatsiyakh. Ukrayins’kyy stomatolohichnyy al’manakh. 2010;2(2):121-2. [in Ukrainian].
12. Denisova YuL. Sovremennyie voprosyi esteticheskoy stomatologii. Stomatolog. 2014;(2):39-44. [in Russian].
13. Khemmsvar PD, O’Konnor M, Ksyulinh V. Tekhnolohiya svitlovoho zatverdinnya: mynule, s’ohodennya i maybutnye. Dent Art. 2006;3:64-7. [in Ukrainian].
14. Walter R, Swift E, Heikh H, Ferracane JL. Effects of temperature on composite resin shrinkage. Quintessence int. 2009;40(843):7.
15. Uctasli MB, Arisu HD, Lasilla LV, Valittu PK. Effect of preheating on the mechanical properties of resin composites. Eur. j. dent. 2008;2(263):8.
16. Wagner WC, Asku MN, Neme AL, Linger JB, Pink FE, Walker S. Effect of pre-heating resin composite on restotation microleakage. Oper. dent. 2008;33(72):8.
17. Sklyarov IA. Pryamyye kompozitnyye restavratsii v neinvazivnoy tekhnike. Esteticheskaya stomatologiya. 2012;1:12-5. [in Russiаn].
18. Pfeifer CS, Shelton ZR, Braga RR, Windmoller D, Machado JC, Stansbury JW. Characterization of dimethacrylate polymeric networks: a study of the crosslinked structure formed by monomers used in dental composites. European polymer journal. 2010;2(47):162-70.
19. Giorgi MC, Lima DA, Marchi GM, Ambrosano GM, Aguiar FH. Influence of softening test and light-activation protocols on resin composite polymer structure. Eur. J. Dent. 2014;8(1):9-14.
20. Giorgi MC, Theobaldo J, Lima DA, Marchi GM, Ambrosano GM, Aguiar FH. Influence of successive lightactivation on degree of conversion and knoop hardness of the first layered composite increment. Acta Odontol. Scand. 2015;73(2):126-31.
21. Pieniak D, Niewczas AM, Walczak M, Zamościńska J. Influence of photopolymerization parameters on the mechanical properties of polymerceramic composites applied in the conservative dentistry. Acta Bioeng. Biomech. 2014;16(3):29-35.
22. Alyamovskiy VV, Och AN, Kurochkin VN, Bakashvily NT. Polimerizatsionnyye vozmozhnosti stomatologicheskikh fotopolimerizatsionnykh ustroystv diodnogo tipa. Sibirskoye meditsinskoye obozreniye. 2009;5:61-5. [in Russiаn].
23. Son SA, Roh HM, Hur B, Know YH, Park JK. The effect of resin thickness on polymerization characteristics of silorane-based composite resin. Restor. Dent. Endod. 2014;39(4):310-8.
24. Tarle Z, Attin T, Marovic D, Andermatt L, Ristic M, Tauböck T. Influence of irradiation time on subsurface degree of conversion and microhardness of high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites. Clin. Oral Investig. 2015;19(4):831-40.
25. Beriat NC, Ertan A, Cehreli ZC. Time-dependent conversion of a methacrylate-based sealer polymerized with different light-curing units. J. Endod. 2009;35(1):110-2.
26. Ceballos L, Fuentes MV, Tafalla H. Curing effectiveness of resin composites at different exposure times using LED and halogen units. Med. Oral. Patol. Oral. Cir. Bucal. 2009;14(1):51-60.
27. Shumilovich BR, Rostovtsev VV, Povolotskiy AV. Sravnitel’naya kharakteristika effektivnosti pryamykh i nepryamykh metodov restavratsii v polostyakh s vysokim znacheniyem faktora konfiguratsii (S-faktora). Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya Yestestvennyye i tekhnicheskiye nauki. Tambov. 2017;22(6):1567-72. [in Russiаn].
28. Knyazeva MA. Vidy stomatologicheskikh fotopolimerizatsionnykh ustroystv i ikh sravnitel’naya kharakteristika. Vestnik VGMU. 2011;10(4):13847. [in Russiаn].
29. Shumilovich BG, Sushchenko AV, Morozov AN, Podoprigora AV, Saneyev AV, Popova IP. Vliyaniye faktora konfiguratsii polosti (C-factor) na kachestvo krayevoy adaptatsii kompozita. Zdorov’ye i obrazovaniye v XXI veke. 2016;2. [in Russiаn].
30. Udod AA, Antipova IM. Issledovaniye dinamiki svetovogo potoka fotopolimerizatora v zavisimosti ot prozrachnosti tverdykh tkaney zubov. Vestnik problem biologii i meditsiny. 2014;2(3):369-71. [in Russiаn].
31. Polishchuk DB. Progressivnyye lazernyy tekhnologii v lecheniye zabolevaniy polosti rta. Vestnik KB № 51. 2010;9:40-1. [in Russiаn].
32. Kuznetsova AA. Metody preduprezhdeniya postplombirovochnykh oslozhneniy na stadii polimerizatsii kompozita. Zdorov’ye i obrazovaniye v XXI veke. 2013;1-4:44. [in Russiаn].

«Bulletin of problems biology and medicine» Issue 4 Part 2 (147), 2018 year, 72-77 pages, index UDK 616.314:615.45:543.45

10.29254/2077-4214-2018-4-2-147-72-77