Gavreliuk S. V.

MORPHOLOGY

Scentific article

In the work current questions of studying structural changes in the wall of the abdominal aorta in the experiment with long immobilization stress on the background of sympathicotonia with an increase in the activity of the sympathetic department of the VNS and the normal tone of the parasympathetic department of the VNS are considered. The purpose of this study was to reveal the effect of prolonged sympathicotonia on the structure of the wall of the abdominal aorta in rats in an experiment. The studies were performed on three comparable groups of hundred-day Wistar rats, which for a period of 10 days were exposed to immobilization stress and sympathicotonia. As a method of stress, immobilization stress was chosen, which was modeled by placing the rats in a special plastic pencil box, limiting their movements for four hours at room temperature of the ambient air. As a model of sympathicotonia, sympathicotonia was chosen with an increase in the activity of the sympathetic division of the VNS and the normal tone of the parasympathetic section of the VNS, which was achieved by the administration of α- and β-adrenomimetics of adrenaline tartrate, whose action coincides with the effect of stimulation of sympathetic nerve fibers. The animals were divided into 3 groups of 10 each: I group – control – rats, which were injected subcutaneously with 0.3 ml of a 0.9% solution of NaCl every day, Group II – animals subjected to immobilization stress and Group III – rats, daily subcutaneously injected adrenaline tartrate at a rate of 0.05 mg·kg-1 and subjected to immobilization stress. On the 10th day, the animals were removed from the experiment by decapitation in an anesthetic state (calypsole at the rate of 16 mg·kg-1 of animal weight intraperitoneally). It was found that the support of prolonged immobilization of sympathicotonia with an increase in the activity of the sympathetic division of the VNS and the normal tone of the parasympathetic division of the VNS has a certain angioprotective effect, but does not protect against the development of an inflammatory reaction in adventitia and degenerative changes in the elastic fibers of all layers of the wall of the abdominal aorta.

structure of the vascular wall, abdominal aorta, sympathicotonia

1. Abboud FM. The Walter B. Cannon Memorial Award Lecture. Physiology in perspective: the wisdom of the body. In search of autonomic balance: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2010;298(6):1449-67. DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00130.2010
2. Abboud FM, Harwani SC, Chapleau MW. Autonomic neural regulation of the immune system: implications for hypertension and cardiovascular disease. Hypertension. 2012;59(4):755-62. DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.186833
3. Marwah RS, Doux JD, Lee PY, Yun AJ. Is atherosclerosis a neurogenic phenomenon? Med Hypotheses. 2007;69(4):884-7. DOI: 10.1016/j. mehy.2007.01.066
4. Shavrin AP, Khovayeva YAB, Golovskiy BV, Berg MD. Osnovnyye faktory remodelirovaniya sosudistoy stenki. Kardiologiya. 2014;54(5):48-53. [in Russian].
5. Poryadin GV, redaktor. Stress i patologiya. M.: RGMU; 2009. 23 s. [in Russian].
6. Gavrelyuk SV, Levenets SV. Vliyaniye simpatikotonii na parametry gemodinamiki i funktsiyu endoteliya pri khronicheskom stresse v eksperimente. Aktual’ní problemi suchasnoí̈ meditsini: vísnik Ukraí̈ns’koí̈ medichnoí̈ stomatologíchnoí̈ akademíí̈. 2017;1(57):225-9. [in Russian].
7. Avtandilov GG. Meditsinskaya morfometriya. Rukovodstvo. M.: Meditsina; 1990. 384 s. [in Russian].
8. Majesky MW. Adventitia and Perivascular Cells Arterioscler Thromb. Vasc Biol. 2015;35(8):31-5. DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.115.306088
9. Stenmark KR, Yeager ME, El Kasmi KC, Nozik-Grayck Е, Gerasimovskaya EV, Li M, et al. The adventitia: essential regulator of vascular wall structure and function. Annu Rev Physiol. 2013;75:23-47. DOI:
10. 1146/annurev-physiol-030212-183802 10. Gingras M, Farand P, Safar ME, Plante GE. Adventitia: the vital wall of conduit arteries. JASH. 2009;3(3):166-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jash.2009.03.002
11. Hu Y, Xu Q. Adventitial Biology. Differentiation and Function. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2011;31(7):1523-9. DOI: doi. org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.221176
12. Marwah RS, Doux JD, Lee PY, Yun AJ. Is atherosclerosis a neurogenic phenomenon? Med Hypotheses. 2007;69(4):884-7. DOI: 10.1016/j. mehy.2007.01.066
13. Yun AJ, Doux JD, Bazar KA, Lee PY. Adventitial dysfunction: an evolutionary model for understanding atherosclerosis. Medical Hypotheses. 2005;65(5):962-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2005.02.009
14. Zubcevic J, Jun JY, Kim S, Perez PD, Afzal A, Shan Z, et al. Altered inflammatory response is associated with an impaired autonomic input to the bone marrow in the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Hypertension. 2014;63(3):542-50. DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.02722

«Bulletin of problems biology and medicine» Issue 3 (145), 2018 year, 265-269 pages, index UDK 616-092.4:616.136

10.29254/2077-4214-2018-3-145-265-269