Krasnokutskyi O. A., Hasiuk P. A., Huda N. V., Vorobets A. B., Rosolovska S. O.

LITERATURE REVIEWS

Scentific article

This article presents the results of studies of a number of domestic and foreign authors on the mechanisms of gum recession and ways to eliminate it. In modern conditions for the treatment of gum recession, there are a large number of conservative and surgical methods of treatment. Conservative methods have very limited indications for use and are effective only at the very beginning of the disease. With all the variety of proposed operational techniques, the latter are divided into single-layer (without using free connective tissue graft) and two-layer (using free connective tissue graft). In addition to the above methods, for the treatment of gingival recession, the method of directed tissue regeneration is used, when not resorbing or resorbing biomembranes are installed under the gum. Promising areas of modern science is the study of the use of autologous and allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells for periodontal tissue regeneration, the development of new methods of rehabilitation therapy and their introduction into clinical dentistry, which will increase the efficiency of treatment of periodontal tissue diseases. A number of scientists conducted a study of morphological changes in the tissues of a pathologically modified periodontium when used for the treatment of gum recession biotransplant based on mesenchymal stem cells of adipose tissue immobilized on collagen carriers. The results of the study indicate that this combination of materials contributes to leveling atrophic and dystrophic changes in the gums, reducing the gingival recession and the depth of the gum pocket. This method, according to the authors, can serve as a modern promising way to treat gingival recession. So, given the above, periodontal inflammatory diseases of the tissues represent an important social and medical problem that requires further comprehensive study in order to improve and develop new effective treatment technologies.

recession of gums, periodontal tissues regeneration, graft.

1. Kholodnyak OV. Poshyrenistʹ ta struktura zakhvoryuvanʹ tkanyn parodonta v osib molodoho viku. Klinichna ta eksperymentalʹna patolohiya. 2015;15;3(53):159-62. [in Ukrainian].
2. Avetikov DS, Yatsenko IV, Lokes KP, Stavytsʹkyy SO, Kaplun DV. Suchasni pidkhody do khirurhichnoho likuvannya retsesiy yasen. Visnyk problem biolohiyi ta medytsyny. 2015;2;2 (119):9-11. [in Ukrainian].
3.  Alghamdi H, Babay N, Sukumaran A. Surgical management of gingival recession: a clinical update. The Saudi dental journal. 2009;21(2): 83-94.
4. Azaripour A, Kissinger M, Farina VSL, Van Noorden CJ, Gerhold-Ay A, Willershausen B, et al. Root coverage with connective tissue graft associated with coronally advanced flap or tunnel technique: a randomized, double-blind, mono-centre clinical trial. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2016;43(12):1142-50.
5. Chrysanthakopoulos NA. Gingival recession: prevalence and risk indicators among young greek adults. Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry. 2014;6(3):243.
6. Chumakova Y, Vyshnevska A. Рrevalence, extension and severity of gingival recession in adults. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2015;42:146.
7. Rusyn VV, Kolbasko LV, Honcharuk-Khomyn MYu. Otsinka uspishnosti vykorystannya tunelʹnykh tekhnik vtruchannya z metoyu zakryttya retsesiyi yasen: analiz danykh klinichnykh doslidzhenʹ. Molodyy vchenyy. 2018;7(59):396-8. [in Ukrainian].
8. Smirnova SS. Optimizatsiya lecheniya retsessiy desny patsiyentov s tonkim biotipom desny na fone vospalitel’nykh zabolevaniy parodonta. Problemy stomatologii. 2010;4:4-11. [in Russian].
9. Yel’kova NL, Beleneva YeV, Lazutikov OV. Primeneniye svobodnogo soyedinitel’notkannogo transplantanta v lechenii oslozhneniya khronicheskogo parodontita – retsessii desny. Nauchnyye vedomosti BelGU. Seriya Meditsina. Farmatsiya. 2011;16(111):50-4. [in Russian].
10. Santamaria MP, Neves FLDS, Silveira CA, Mathias IF, FernandesDias SB, Jardini MAN, et al. Connective tissue graft and tunnel or trapezoidal flap for the treatment of single maxillary gingival recessions: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2017;44(5): 540-7.
11. Sculean A, Cosgarea R, Stahli A, Katsaros C, Arweiler NB, Miron RJ, et al. Treatment of multiple adjacent maxillary Miller Class I, II, and III gingival recessions with the modified coronally advanced tunnel, enamel matrix derivative, and subepithelial connective tissue graft: A report of 12 cases. Quintessence Int. 2016;47(8):653-9.
12. Sculean A, Cosgarea R, Stähli A, Katsaros C, Arweiler NB, Brecx M, et al. The modified coronally advanced tunnel combined with an enamel matrix derivative and subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of isolated mandibular Miller Class I and II gingival recessions: a report of 16 cases. Quintessence Int. 2014;45:829-35.
13. Seong J, Bartlett D, Newcombe RG, Claydon NCA, Hellin N, West NX. Prevalence of gingival recession and study of associated related factors in young UK adults. Journal of Dentistry. 2018;S0300-5712(18):30163-5.
14. Shkreta M, Atanasovska-Stojanovska A, Dollaku B, Belazelkoska Z. Exploring the gingival recession surgical treatment modalities: a literature review. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2018;6(4):698-708.
15. Thalmair T, Fickl S, Wachtel H. Coverage of multiple mandibular gingival recessions using tunnel technique with connective tissue graft: a prospective case series. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2016;36:859-67.
16. Aroca S, Keglevich T, Nikolidakis D, Gera I, Nagy K, Azzi R, et al. Treatment of class III multiple gingival recessions: a randomized-clinical trial. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2010;37(1):88-97.
17. Aroca S, Molnár B, Windisch P, Gera I, Salvi GE, Nikolidakis D, et al. Treatment of multiple adjacent Miller class I and II gingival recessions with a Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel (MCAT) technique and a collagen matrix or palatal connective tissue graft: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2013;40(7):713-20.
18. Nastych O, Melnychuk I, Pryshlyak V, Goncharuk-Khomyn M, Siegfried L. Differences of the bacterial, biological and immunological aspects of periimplantitis and periodontitis. Literature review. Novyny stomatolohiyi. 2016;2:61-4.
19. Vincent-Bugnas S, Borie G, Charbit Y. Treatment of multiple maxillary adjacent class I and II gingival recessions with modified coronally advanced tunnel and a new xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2018;30(2):89-95.
20. Vincent-Bugnas S, Charbit Y, Lamure J, Mahler P, Dard MM. Modified tunnel technique combined with enamel matrix derivative: a minimally invasive treatment for single or multiple class I recession defects. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2015;27(3):145-54.
21. Zuhr O, Rebele SF, Schneider D, Jung RE, Hürzeler MB. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part I. Clinical and patient-centred outcomes. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2014;41(6):582-92.
22. Runova GS, Gugkayeva ZD, Vybornaya YeI, Vaytsner YeYu. Likvidatsiya retsessiy, sovremennyy podkhod k plasticheskoy periodontal’noy khirurgii. Meditsinskiy Sovet. 2011;7-8:107-9. [in Russian].
23. Turchyn RS, Pyuryk VP, Protsʹ HB. Suchasni aspekty khirurhichnoho likuvannya osib pokhyloho viku, khvorykh na heneralizovanyy parodontyt. Klinichna stomatolohiya. 2014;1:45-50. [in Ukrainian].
24. Rubnikovich SP, Denisova YuL, Vladimirskaya TE, Andreyeva VA, Kvacheva ZB, Panasenkova GYu, i dr. Regenerativnyye kletochnyye tekhnologii v lechenii retsessii desny. STM. 2018;10(4):94-104. [in Russian].

«Bulletin of problems biology and medicine» Issue 2 Part 1 (150), 2019 year, 46-49 pages, index UDK 418.36:28.14

10.29254/2077-4214-2019-2-1-150-46-49