Yanishen I. V., Yarovaya A. V., Berezhnaya O. O., Dolya A. V., Bogatyrenko M. V.

LITERATURE REVIEWS

Scentific article

The aim of the study was to increase the effectiveness of orthopedic treatment of dental patients by introducing the clinical aspects of the using of basic and auxiliary dental materials in the context of ensuring the quality of treatment with orthopedic structures. Were reviewed and analyzed atricles of domestic and foreign authors, who focused on innovative developments in the field of dental materials science due to the reasonable selection of structural and auxiliary dental-technical materials by eliminating the negative factors influencing orthopedic dentures caused by their composition or by deficiencies in clinical and laboratory stages of the denture’s manufacturing. One of the most actual question in the development of modern dentistry is to increase the effectiveness of orthopedic treatment. A large number of works devoted to the improvement of the quality of orthopedic constructions has a huge influence of improvement of materials and methods in dental clinic and in all stages of qualitive orthopedic treatment. Characteristics and right description of modern dental materials and problematic aspects of their clinical application in the treatment of patients with orthopedic dentures must be taken into account. Also, the development and introduction of new dental materials is an important factor in development of modern orthopedic dentistry. A large number of proposed systems and algorithms for evaluation in orthopedic dentistry are noted as separate sporadic authoritarian attempts to generalize. But, unfortunately, the significant differences in the components of these systems and algorithms do not make it easier for them to perceive and understand when constructing a prosthetic design and choosing a dental material, do not approach the wide practical using. And the realities of orthopedic services in Ukraine today require the immediate creation and implementation of a single, adapted nationwide system for assessing the quality of dental orthopedic treatment that would fully satisfy both doctors and patients. The analysis of literature sources suggests the relevance of the problem of improving the quality of orthopedic treatment of orthopedic patients. Especially it should be noted the close relationship between the clinical and technological (reasonable selection of dental-technical materials) and medical and psychological factors of treatment.

orthopedic treatment, basic and auxiliary dental technical materials, quality of treatment, review of the literature, production of dentures.

1. Nespryadko VP, Skibickij VS. Poshirenist ta harakter uskladnen pislya preparuvannya tverdih tkanin zubiv pid neznimni sucilnovidliti konstrukciyi. Materiali III (H) z’yizdu Asociaciyi stomatologiv. 2008;1:416-7. [in Ukranian].
2. Ozhogan ZR. Problemi i zavdannya pri vikoristanni mostopodibnih proteziv. Aktualni problemi ortopedichnoyi stomatologiyi: materiali Vseukr. nauk.-prakt. konf. 2000. s. 93-4. [in Ukranian].
3.  Hussain M, Ali S, Khan Tanveer W. Quality of Life in Pediatric Patients after providing removable acrylic partial denture. Pakistan Oral & Dental journal. 2014;34(3):64-7.
4.  Devdera OI. Analiz gigiyenichnogo stanu zubnih znimnih plastinochnih proteziv iz akrilovih plastmas pri riznih terminah ta zasobah koristuvannya nimi. Ukrayinskij medichnij almanah. 2011;14:61-2. [in Ukranian].
5.  Kaplan P. Flexible Partial Denture Variations: The Use of Circumferential, Combination, and Continuous Clasp Designs. Dentistry Today. 2012;31(10):138-41.
6. Shuturminskij VG. Pokrashennya adaptaciyi do proteziv iz bezakrilovoyi plastmasi za dopomogoyu adaptacijnogo gelyu. Ukrayinskij stomatologichnij almanah. 2009;4:28-9. [in Ukranian].
7. Gocko YM. Ultrastruktura slizovoyi obolonki yasen paciyentiv pri do-vgotrivalomu nosinni neznimnih proteziv, vigotovlenih iz plastmasi, metalokeramiki ta splaviv iz zolotom. Klinichna stomatologiya. 2014;3:83. [in Ukranian].
8. Ozhogan ZR, Yakovin OM. Klinichna i eksperimentalna porivnyalna ocinka vdoskonalenih metodiv vigotovlennya estetichnih neznimnih konstrukcij zubnih proteziv. Ukrayinskij stomatologichnij almanah. 2014;2:41-6. [in Ukranian].
9.  Rodan R, Ajarmah M. Adverse effects of removable partial dentures on periodontal status and oral health of partially edentulous patients. Journal of the Royal Medical Services. 2012;19:53-8.
10.  Kuz VS, Dvornik VM. Harakteristika suchasnih bazisnih stomatologichnih materialiv ta yih vpliv na tkanini porozhnini rota. Aktualni problemi suchasnoyi medicini: Visnik ukrayinskoyi medichnoyi stomatologichnoyi akademiyi. 2014;2(46):179-83. [in Ukranian].
11.  Sultan J, Memon MR, Kashif M, Kashif N. General complications in patients wearing polymethylmethacrylate heat cure acrylic resin partial removable dental prostheses. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal. 2015;2(35):339-42.
12. Nidzelskij MY, Kuznecov VV. Povyshenie prochnostnyh harakteristik akrilovyh plastmass dlya bazisov semnyh protezov s pomoshyu elektromagnitnoj tehnologii. Sovremennaya stomatologiya. 2012;2:99-110. [in Russian].
13.  Chirkova NV. Cliniko-eksperimentalnoe obosnovanie primeneniya modifitsirovannogo elastichnogo akrilovogo polimera dlya bazisov s’emnyih plastinochnyih protezov [avtoreferat]. 2003. 20 s. [in Russian].
14.  Shadi Adnan AH. Zmini v porozhnini rota pri likuvanni riznimi konstruktsiyami ortodontichnih aparativ [avtoreferat]. 2007. 17 s. [in Ukranian].
15.  Linda J, Kujtim Sh, Teuta P. The influence of removable partial dentures on the periodontal health of abutment and non-abutment teeth. Eur J Dent. 2015;9(3):382-6.
16.  Preshaw PM, Walls AG, Jakubovics NS. Association of removable partial denture use with oral and systemic health. J Dent. 2011;39:711-9.
17.  Yuschenko PL, Korol DM, Odzhubeyska OD, Vizhenko EE. Pozitivni vlastivosti silikonovih vidbitkovih materialiv. PEM. 2012;1(2):43. [in Ukranian].
18. Pisarenko OA, Shilenko DR. Vpliv harakteristik gidrofilnosti vidbitkovogo materialu na yakist restavratsii vikonanoi za terapevtichnimi shablonami. Aktualni problemi suchasnoi meditsini: Visnik ukrayinskoi medichnoyi stomatologichnoii akademii. 2014;2(46):99-101. [in Ukranian].
19.  Moreira AH, Rodrigues F, Fonseca J. Accuracy Comparison of Implant Impression Techniques. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2015;2:751-4.
20. Doynikov AI, Sinitsyin VD. Zuboteznicheskoe materialovedenie. Moskva: Meditsina; 2006. 208 s. [in Russian].
21. Yuschenko PL, Korol DM, Korol MD. Porivnyalna harakteristika S-Silikonovih i A-silikonovih vidbitkovih materialiv. Ukrainskiy stomatologichniy almanah. 2013;2:132-40. [in Ukranian].
22. Nandini V, Venkatesh K. Alginate impressions: a practical perspective. J Conserv Dent. 2008;11:37-41.
23.  Brehichuk PP, Klitinska OV. Analiz ob’emnoy usadki silikonovyih ottiskov pri dezinfektsii himicheskim metodom. Visnik problem biologiii i meditsini. 2012;3:194-8. [in Ukranian].
24.  Bida VI, Bakshutova NO, Palivoda II. Pidvischennya efektivnosti ortopedichnogo likuvannya hvorih z defektami koronok zubiv i zubnih ryadiv neznimnimi konstruktsiyami zubnih proteziv shlyahom profIlaktiki retsesii yasennogo krayu. Ukrainskiy stomatologichniy almanah. 2015;1:56- 8. [in Ukranian].
25. Hyde TP, Craddock HL, Gray JC. A Randomised Controlled Trial of Complete Denture Impression Materials. Journal of Dentistry. 2014;42(8):895- 901.
26. Flis PS, Bannik TM. Tehnika vigotovlennya znimnih proteziv. K.: Meditsina; 2008. 256 s. [in Ukranian].
27. Grigorenko YM, Grigorenko AY, Nespryadko VP, Tormahov NN, Tihonov DA. Opredelenie opornyih reaktsiy chastichnyih s’emnyih protezov. Visnik problem biologii i meditsini. 2012;2:136-9. [in Russiаn].
28. Gerasimchuk PG, Masheyko IV, Yaloviy IL. Pokraschennya stabilizatsii povnih znimnih proteziv u patsientiv iz periodichnimi nabryakami slizovoyi obolonki. Ukrayinskiy stomatologichniy almanah. 2014;2:23-7. [in Ukranian].
29. KindIy DD, Kingky VD, Toncheva KD. Schodo pitannya riznih metodiv polimerizatsii bazisnih plastmas. Ukrayinskiy stomatologichniy almanah. 2013;4:57-64. [in Ukranian].
30. Fastovets OO, Kotelevskiy RA, Krizhanovskiy AE. Doslidzhennya zmin mikrotsirkulyatsii krovi v tkaninah proteznogo lozha pri koristuvanni povnimi znimnimi protezami. Ukrainskiy stomatologichniy almanah. 2013;4:248-55. [in Ukranian].
31. Komar IG, Kirmanov OS. Porivnyalna otsinka fiziko-mehanichnih vlastivostey riznih materialiv dlya timchasovogo protezuvannya, yaki vplivayut na yihnyu mitsnist i klinichnu stabilnist. Ukrainskiy stomatologichniy almanah. 2013;2:58-61. [in Ukranian].
32. Skubiy IV. Vikoristannya magnitiv dlya fiksatsii znimnih proteziv. Ukrainskiy stomatologichniy almanah. 2012;3:152-8. [in Ukranian].
33.  Shuturminskiy VG, Tatarina OV. Klinichne obgruntuvannya novoyi konstruktsii znimnogo proteza pri protezuvanni velikih defektiv zubnih ryadiv u psihichno hvorih. Ukrayinskiy stomatologichniy almanah. 2009;3:26-9. [in Ukranian].

«Bulletin of problems biology and medicine» Issue 1 Part 2 (149), 2019 year, 59-66 pages, index UDK 616:314-089.23:615.461/.465

10.29254/2077-4214-2019-1-2-149-59-66