Badalova A. A.

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE

Scentific article

Abstract. The purpose of the study. To evaluate the effectiveness of modern informative methods for optimal diagnosis of genital endometriosis. Object and methods of the research. The study involved 120 women of reproductive age with genital endometriosis. The following methods were used: clinical, laboratory, and instrumental. Individual maps were developed. Instrumental methods of examination included: colposcopy; transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasound of the pelvic organs (the device “LOGIK 500GE” and “MEDISONSA-8000”, Korea); urography; X-ray examination (RH) of the pelvic organs; hysterosalpingography; and also hysteroscopy (assessment of the state of the uterus and fallopian tubes). The results of the study and their discussion. The examined patients were divided into the corresponding groups: group I (retrospective studies) consisted of n=70 patients with genital endometriosis; group II (prospective studies) consisted of n=50 patients with this disease; group III (CG) consisted of n=30 conditionally healthy fertile women without this pathology. Clinical, laboratory and diagnostic examinations of patients revealed the following forms of genital endometriosis, such as: peritoneal endometriosis that was detected in 51 (42.5%) cases; extraperitoneal endometriosis was in 38 (31.7%) cases; endometriosis of the uterine body – in 19(15.8%) cases; retrocervical endometriosis was noted in 12 (10%) cases, respectively. The obtained results emphasize and show us that genital endometriosis is a recurrent disease, characterized by a chronic course with a tendency to rapid progression, leading to a violation of the reproductive ability of women and a decrease in their quality of life. Conclusions. Genital endometriosis of any localization has a tendency to rapid progression, which is often the cause of reduced quality of life in women, and can also cause impaired reproductive function.

genital endometriosis, pelvic ultrasound, laparoscopic diagnosis.

1. Bazot M, Darai E. Diagnosis of deep endometriosis: clinical examination, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and other techniques. J. Fertil. Steril. 2017;108:886-894
2. Boulder N, Fava V, Budianu MA, Chauvet P, Canis M, Chadeyras J. Laparoscopic Resection of Diaphragmatic Endometriosis in 10 Steps. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019;26(7):1224-1225. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019. 04.008.
3. Nisenblat V, Prentice I, Bossuyt PM, Farquhar C, Hull ML, Johnson N Combination of the noninvasive tests for the diagnosis of endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 13;7(7):CD012281. doi: 10.1002/ 14651858.CD012281.
4. Magalov IS. Sovremennye aspekty diagnostiki i lechenija tazovogo jendometrioza. [avtoreferat dissertatsii]. Baku: Azerbaydzhansk med univ-t; 2013. 44 s. [in Russian].
5. Padrul’ MM, Shirinkina EV, Mahmudova SJe. Problema diagnostiki jendometrioza v ramkah sistemnogo zabolevanija. Permskij medicinskij zhurnal. 2018;35(1):21-26. [in Russian].
6. Solomatina AA, Strygina VA, Hamzin IZ, Bulatova LS. Ul’trazvukovye indikatory ovarial’nogo rezerva pri vpervye vyjavlennyh i recidivirujushhih jendometrioidnyh obrazovanijah jaichnikov. Rossijskij vestnik akushera-ginekologa. 2017;17(4):43-48. [in Russian].
7. Exacoustos C, Zupi E, Piccione E. Ultrasound imaging for ovarian and deep infiltrating endometriosis. Semin Reprod Med. 2017 Jan;35(1):5-24. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1597127.
8. Ceccaroni M, Ceccarello M, Caleffi G, Clarizia R, Scarperi S, Mauro Pastorello M, Molinari A, Ruffo G, Cavalleri S. Total laparoscopic ureteroneocyctostomy for uteral endometriosis: a single-center experience of 160 consecutive patients. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2019;26:78-86.

«Bulletin of problems biology and medicine» Issue 1 (159), 2021 year, 18-22 pages, index UDK 618.177

10.29254/2077-4214-2021-1-159-18-22