Plehutsa O. I., Kalashnikov O. O., Hrynevych A. A.

FEATURES OF THE MORBID BACKGROUND OF PATIENTS WITH DEFECTS AND AESTHETIC DEFORMITIES OF THE ANTERIOR ABDOMINAL WALL AND CONCOMITANT METABOLIC DISORDERS

---

Show/Download

About the author:

Plehutsa O. I., Kalashnikov O. O., Hrynevych A. A.

Heading:

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE

Type of article:

Scientific article

Annotation:

Defects and aesthetic deformations of the anterior abdominal wall (AAW) are a significant problem in modern surgery. They most often develop as a result of postoperative complications, injuries, obesity, or significant fluctuations in body weight. An important aspect in the treatment of such patients is the assessment of the morbid background, which includes concomitant diseases, metabolic status, and general health. The study aims to determine the features of the morbid background of patients with defects and aesthetic deformities of the anterior abdominal wall. The study included 288 patients of the Center who underwent various types of plastic and reconstructive surgical interventions on the anterior abdominal wall from 2014 to 2024. Patients were divided into 3 groups: aesthetic-reconstructive profile group, inguinal-herniological profile group, ventral-herniological profile group. In each group, the average values of age, sex, body mass index (BMI), length of stay in the hospital, types of surgical interventions, duration of surgical intervention were given, and the percentage distribution of patients by the morbid background of concomitant pathology was performed. Therefore, before surgical intervention, it is essential to pay special attention to identifying and correcting the underlying disease, since concomitant diseases can significantly affect both the operation and postoperative recovery. Uncompensated pathologies can complicate the course of surgical treatment, increase the risk of complications and negatively impact the general condition of the patient. Therefore, it is advisable first to stabilize concomitant diseases, ensure their compensation and implement preventive measures. Such an approach will help reduce risks, increase the effectiveness of surgical treatment and speed up the patient's recovery.

Tags:

Bibliography:

1. Seretis K, Goulis DG, Koliakos G, Demiri E. The effects of abdominal lipectomy in metabolic syndrome components and insulin sensitivity in females: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Metabolism. 2015;64(12):1640-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2015.09.015.
2. Norris P, Gow J, Arthur T, Conway A, Fleming FJ, Ralph N. Metabolic syndrome and surgical complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 13 million individuals. Int J Surg. 2024;110(1):541-553. DOI: 10.1097/JS9. 0000000000000834.
3. Rosenfield LK, Davis CR. Evidence-Based Abdominoplasty Review With Body Contouring Algorithm. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39(6):643-661. DOI: 10.1093/ asj/sjz013.
4. Le Louarn C, Pascal JF. The high-superior-tension technique: evolution of lipoabdominoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2010;34(6):773-81. DOI: 10.1007/ s00266-010-9551-5.
5. American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank Statistics. Aesthet Surg J. 2015;35(2):1-24.
6. Friedman T, Wiser I. Abdominal Contouring and Combining Procedures. Clin Plast Surg. 2019;46(1):41-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.cps.2018.08.006.
7. Matarasso A, Swift RW, Rankin M. Abdominoplasty and abdominal contour surgery: a national plastic surgery survey. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:1797-1808.
8. Tzimas P, Petrou A, Laou E, Milionis H, Mikhailidis DP, Papadopoulos G. Impact of metabolic syndrome in surgical patients: should we bother? Br J Anaesth. 2015;115(2):194-202. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aev199.
9. Zavlin D, Jubbal KT, Balinger CL, Dinh TA, Friedman JD, Echo A. Impact of Metabolic Syndrome on the Morbidity and Mortality of Patients Undergoing Panniculectomy. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2017;41(6):1400-1407. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-017-0952-6.
10. He Y, Wijaya WA, Du Y, Wijaya WA, Cen Y, Li Z. The Impact of Diabetes on Abdominoplasty Outcomes: A Systematic Review and MetaAnalysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025;49(3):814-823. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-024-04565-2.
11. Samuel AR, Campbell C, DeGeorge BR Jr, Black J, Stranix JT. Abdominal Panniculectomy: Determining the Impact of Diabetes on Adverse Outcomes and Complications. Plast Surg (Oakv). 2024;32(1):33-39. DOI: 10.1177/22925 503221078850.
12. Ma Q, Jing W, Liu X, Liu J, Liu M, Chen J. The global, regional, and national burden and its trends of inguinal, femoral, and abdominal hernia from 1990 to 2019: findings from the 2019 Global Burden of Disease Study – a cross-sectional study. Int J Surg. 2023;109(3):333- 342. DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000217.
13. Hammoud M, Gerken J. Inguinal Hernia. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025.
14. Cherla DV, Poulose B, Prabhu AS. Epidemiology and Disparities in Care: The Impact of Socioeconomic Status, Gender, and Race on the Presentation, Management, and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Ventral Hernia Repair. Surg Clin North Am. 2018;98(3):431-440. DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2018.02.003.
15. Zavlin D, Jubbal KT, Van Eps JL, Bass BL, Ellsworth WA 4th, Echo A, et al. Safety of open ventral hernia repair in high-risk patients with metabolic syndrome: a multi-institutional analysis of 39,118 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(2):206-213. DOI: 10.1016/j. soard.2017.09.521.

Publication of the article:

«Bulletin of problems biology and medicine», 2025 Issue 1, 176, 278-287 pages, index UDC 617.55-052-056.52-089.11

DOI:

10.29254/2077-4214-2025-1-176-278-287