Lisovyy M. M., Kolomiiets Yu. V., Dmytrieva O. E., Tsurkan R. P.

EDUCATIONAL DISCIPLINE "BIOSAFETY AND BIOETHICS" IN PROVIDING THE PROFESSIONALISM OF BIOTECHNOLOGIST STUDENTS

---

Show/Download

About the author:

Lisovyy M. M., Kolomiiets Yu. V., Dmytrieva O. E., Tsurkan R. P.

Heading:

MEDICAL EDUCATION

Type of article:

Scientific article

Annotation:

This article discusses the historical, methodological and educational aspects of the discipline (ED) "Biosafety and Bioethics", which is designed for Master's degree students and consists of 2 content modules, which is 120 hours, which corresponds to 4 EKTS credits. Each content module includes 4 lectures and 7 laboratory classes, as well as 75 hours of independent work. The study of the ED "Biosafety and Bioethics" contributes to the implementation of the basic rules of biosafety and bioethics in work with students, familiarisation with modern biotechnologies in biological and medical fields of activity, understanding of bioethics, real risks in the manipulation of genomes, knowledge of the main regulatory and legal documents in the world and Ukraine on biosafety and bioethics. Master biotechnologists should be guided by and strictly adhere to legal and ethical aspects when conducting research with living organisms and distributing and disposing of the laboratory material used.

Tags:

Bibliography:

1. Hazan VB. Do pytannya ekologichnoy bezpeky v konteksti stalogo rozvytku regioniv: metodytchni zasady. Екоlogiya i pryrodokorystuvanniya. Zbirnyk naukovyh praz IPPE Ukrayny. 2017;5:62-63. [in Ukrainian].
2. Кlyachenko ОL, Lisovyy ММ, Кvasko ОYu. Fundamentals of Biodiversity. K.: Komprint; 2023. 315. p. Available from: https://dglib.nubip. edu.ua/ handle/123456789/10062.
3. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention Biological Diversity: text and annexes. Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity; 2000. 30 p. Available from: https://www.cbd.int/doc/legal/ cartagena-protocol-en.pdf.
4. МОZ Ukrayny. Pravyla vlashtuvannya I bezpeky roboty v laboratoriyah (viddilah, viddilenniyah) mikrobiologitchnogo profiliyu: DSTU 9.9.5.- 080-02. К.: МОZ Ukrayny, Derzhavna sanitarno-epidemiologitchna sluzhba; 2002. 39 s. Dostupno: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/ v0001588-02#Text. [in Ukrainian].
5. WHO. Laboratory biosafety manual. 2nd ed. Geneva: WHO; 2003. 109 p. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35932.00644.
6. US Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Institutes of Health. Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories. 5th ed. Washington: Publisher house of the USA Government; 2009. 436 p. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/biosafety/publications/bmbl5/BMBL.pdf.
7. Fidler D, Gostin L. Biosecurity in the Global Age: Biological Weapons Stanford: Stanford University Press; 2007. 260 p. DOI: 10.1515/ 9780804774475.
8. Kundiyev YuІ. Sutchasni problem bioetyky. K.: “Аkademperiodyka”; 2009. Chastyna, Predmet ta status biologitchnoyi etyky; s. 11-22. [in Ukrainian].
9. Miller S. Ethical and philosophical consideration of the dual-use dilemma in the biological science. Science and engineering ethics. 2007;13(4):523-580. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-007-9043-4.
10. Millet P. The Biological Weapons Convention: Securing biology in the twenty-first century. Journal of Conflict and Security Law. 2010;15(1):25-43.
11. Yermichyn АP. Biotehnologiya. Biobezpeka. Bioetyka. Mn.: Теhnаlоgіya; 2005. 430 s. [in Ukrainian].
12. Finney JL, Slaus I, editors. Assessing the threat of weapons of destruction: The role of independent scientists. Amsterdam: IOP Press; 2010. Chapter, The role of scientists in assessing the risks of dual-use research in the life sciences; p. 137-140.
13. Nazionalna dopovid Ukrayny pro garmonizaciyu zhyttyezdatnosti suspilstva u navkolyschnyomu pryrodnomu seredovytschi. K.: Novyy druk; 2023. 128 s. [in Ukrainian].
14. Кundiyev YuI. Sutchasni problem bioetyky. K.: Аkademperiodyka; 2009. 278 s. [in Ukrainian].
15. WHO. Biorisk management: Laboratory biosecurity guidance. Geneva: WHO; 2006. 41 p. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/ item/ biorisk-management-laboratory-biosecurity-guidance.
16. Аbraham D, Ldler M, Lderman L. Biological safety in microbiological and biomedical laboratories. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2007. 360 p.
17. NUBiP Ukrayiny. Osvitnʹo-profesiyna prohrama Ekolohichna biotekhnolohiya ta bioenerhetyka druhoho (mahistersʹkoho) rivnya vyshchoyi osvity za spetsialʹnistyu 162 «Biotekhnolohiyi ta bioinzheneriya». K.: NUBiP Ukrayiny; 2023. 26 s. [in Ukrainian].
18. Holubnycha VM, Pohoryelov MV, Korniyenko VV. Biobezpeka ta biozakhyst u biolohichnykh laboratoriyakh 1-ho ta 2-ho rivniv biobezpeky. Sumy: Sumsʹkyy derzhavnyy universytet; 2016. 123 s. [in Ukrainian].
19. Кlyachenko ОL, Lisovyy ММ, Кvasko ОYu. Fundamentals of Biodiversity. K.: Komprint; 2023. 315 p.
20. Moskolenko VF. Bioetyka: filosofsʹko-metodolohichni ta sotsialʹno-medychni problemy. Vinnytsya: Nova knyha; 2005. 218 s. [in Ukrainian].
21. Klyachenko OL, Lisovyy MМ, Kvasko OYu. Osnovy bioriznomanitya. Kyyiv: Natsionalʹnyy universytet bioresursiv i pryrodokorystuvannya Ukrayiny; 2022. 300 s. Dostupno: https://dglib.nubip.edu.ua/server/api/core/ bitstreams/f4aad00b-45a7-4c4a-a4a3-72cd72450995/ content. [in Ukrainian].
22. European committee for standardization. Laboratory biorisk management. – Brussels: European committee for standardization; 2021. 46 p. Available from: https://internationalbiosafety.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/CWA-15793-English.pdf.
23. VOOZ. Praktychne kerivnytstvo z biobezpeky v laboratornykh umovakh. 3-ye vyd. Geneva: VOOZ; 2020. 201 s. [in Ukrainian].
24. Nikolaychuk VI, Horbatenko IYu. Henetychna inzheneriya. Uzhhorod; 1999. 189 s. [in Ukrainian].
25. Sorochynsʹkyy BV, Danylʹchenko OO, Kripka HV. Biotekhnolohichni (henetychno modyfikovani) roslyny. K.: Vyd-vo „KVITS”; 2007. 219 s. [in Ukrainian].
26. Ponomarʹov PKh, Syrokhman AB. Bezpeka kharchovykh produktiv ta prodovolʹchoyi syrovyny. K.: Libra; 1999. 272 s. [in Ukrainian].
27. Lisovyy MM, Tarhonya VS, Kolomiyetsʹ YuV, Drozd PYu. Tekhnolohiyi biovyrobnytstva. K.: NUBiP Ukrayiny; 2021. 386 s. [in Ukrainian].
28. Klyachenko OL, Kolomiyetsʹ YuV, Subin OV. Biotekhnolohiya roslyn. K.: NUBiP Ukrayiny; 2023. 352 s. [in Ukrainian].
29. VOOZ. Vidpovidalʹni medyko-biolohichni doslidzhennya v hlobalʹniy bezpetsi systemy okhorony zdorovʺya: metodychnyy dokument. Geneva: VOOZ; 2020. 70 s. [in Ukrainian].
30. Lisovyy MM, Taran OP, Demʺyanyuk OS. Entomopatohenni bakteriyi Bacillus thuringiensis – rehulyator chyselʹnosti nutovoho minera (Liriomyza cicerina Rd.) v biotsenozi. Mikrobiolohichnyy zhurnal. 2018;80(3):90-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/microbiolj80.03.090. [in Ukrainian].

Publication of the article:

«Bulletin of problems biology and medicine», 2024 Issue 3, 174, 222-229 pages, index UDC 60:37.091.212/.5

DOI:

10.29254/2077-4214-2024-3-174-222-229