DYNAMIC COMPARISON THE THIGH LENGTH IN STUDENTS OF BUKOVYNA

  2. 2023
  3. DYNAMIC COMPARISON THE THIGH LENGTH IN STUDENTS OF BUKOVYNA

Karatieieva S. Yu.

DYNAMIC COMPARISON THE THIGH LENGTH IN STUDENTS OF BUKOVYNA

Show/Download

About the author:

Karatieieva S. Yu.

Heading:

SPORT MEDICINE

Type of article:

Scientific article

Annotation:

Under the conditions of a dynamic comparison of thigh length, which was carried out on 132 students of higher education institutions of Bukovyna (the initial study was conducted during September-October 2021, and a repeat study of the same students in September-October 2022). The main group consisted of 92 (69.7%), and the control group was 40 (30.30%) students aged 16 to 18. Students of the main group, in addition to the physical activity that was included in the program of their speciality during the year (training, under the control of the coach, took place three times a week, 1.5 hours on average), attended sections on football, basketball, volleyball and handball. Students of the control group were loaded with hours of physical education, according to their speciality programs, and additionally did not play sports. All students underwent an anthropometric study (thigh length) according to the method of P.P. Shaparenka. A paired t-test (paired-samples t-test) was performed to compare the respondents' indicators during the first and second measurements a year later. Statistical analysis of the obtained data was carried out using the licensed program RStudio. When testing the hypothesis that the average value of the length of the right thigh significantly increased, a significant increase in the length of the right thigh was found between the first (M=53.870, SD=4.098) and the second (M=54.319, SD=4.118) measurements; t(68)= -6.704, p<0.001. The average value of the length of the left thigh also increased significantly, and there was a significant increase in the length of the left thigh between the first (M=53.855, SD=4.237) and the second (M=54.478, SD=4.161) measurements; t(68)= -5.328, p<0.001. A comparison of the length of the thigh in the dynamics after a year; in student-athletes of the main group showed a difference in the increase of the length of the thigh in 2022 compared to 2021 (±0.48-0.62 cm). According to the comparison of the left and right thigh during the second measurement of student-athletes, no significant difference in the average length of the right and left thigh was found (right – 54.31±2.04 cm, left – 54.47±2.04 cm). A significant predictor of thigh length is height. A model was derived for predicting the length of the right thigh Lr = 0.308 h and the left Ll = 0.309 h, where L is the length of the thigh, h is height. The coefficient of determination is 99.8%.

Tags:

anatomy, mathematical model, students, thigh length

Bibliography:

  1. Pavlović R, Mihajlović I, Radulović N, Nikolić S. Anthropometric parameters of elite male runners sprint: are body height and body weight good predictors of results. Health, sport, rehabilitation. 2022;8(3):64-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34142/HSR.2022.08.03.05.
  2. Thomas D, Erdman K, Burke L. American College of Sports Medicine joint position statement. Nutrition and athletic performance. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2016;48(3):543-568. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1249/MSS.0000000000000852.
  3. Aragon AA, Schoenfeld BJ, Wildman R, Kleiner S, VanDusseldorp T, Taylor L, et al. International society of sports nutrition position stand: diets and body composition. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition. 2017;14:16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12970-017- 0174-y.
  4. Perez AJ. Investigation: NFL improperly attempted to influence concussion research. USA: USA Today Sports; 2016. Available from: .com/ story/sports/nfl/2016/05/23/nfl-concussion-research-investigation-nih /84787426/.
  5. Gomez-Ezeiza J, Tam N, Torres-Unda J, Granados C, Santos-Concejero J. Anthropometric characteristics of top-class Olympic race walkers. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. 2019;59(3):429-433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.18.08363-9.
  6. Kozin S, Cretu M, Kozina Z, Chernozub A, Ryepko O, Shepelenko T, et al. Application closed kinematic chain exercises with eccentric and strength exercises for the shoulder injuries prevention in student rock climbers: A randomized controlled trial. Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics. 2021;23(2):159-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37190/ABB-01828-2021-01.
  7. Budzhak VV. Biometriia. Chernivtsi: Chernivetskyi natsionalnyi universytet; 2016. 272 s. [in Ukrainian].
  8. Sorokyn VA, Ponomarev YE. Rozvytye professyonalno – fyzkulturnыkh kompetentsyi po proektyrovanyiu ozdorovytelnыkh tekhnolohyi v systeme podhotovky spetsyalysta po fyzycheskomu vospytanyiu. Hosudarstvennoe y munytsypalnoe upravlenye. Uchenye zapysky. 2020;1:256-260. DOI: 10.22394/2079-1690-2020-1-1-256-260. [in Ukrainian].
  9. Kendall KL, Fukada DH, Hyde PN, Smith-Ryan AE, Moon JR, Stout JR. Estimating fat-free mass in elite-level male rowers: a fourcompartment model validation of laboratory and field methods. Journal of Sports Science. 2017;35(7):624-633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.10 80/02640414.2016.1183802.
  10. Logue D, Madigan SM, Delahunt E, Heinen M, Mc Donnell SJ, Corish CA. Low Energy Availability in Athletes: A Review of Prevalence, Dietary Patterns, Physiological Health, and Sports Performance. Sports Medicine. 2018;48(1):73-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279- 017-0790-3.
  11. Kozina ZhL, Bazilyuk TA, Boyko AG. Analysis of the structure of the integrated preparedness of qualified handballers using multidimensional analysis methods. Health, sport, rehabilitation. 2017;3(2):15-24. DOI: 10.34142/zenodo.1109904.
  12. Karatieieva SYu, Slobodian OM, Moseychuk YuYu, Hauriak OD, Goy RS. Study of anthropometric and morphometric parameters in the training of atheletes. Ukrainskyi zhurnal medytsyny, biolohii ta sportu. 2021;6.5(33):16-22. DOI: 10.26693/jmbs06.05.016. [in Ukrainian].
  13. Karatieieva S, Slobodian O, Lukashiv T, Honchar H, Komar V, Kozlovska S. The determination of distal hip circumference in universities students depending on the sport type. Health, sport, rehabilitation. 2022;8(3):27-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34142/HSR.2022.08.03.02.
  14. Kerr A, Slater G. Impact of food and fluid intake on technical and biological measurement error in body composition assessment methods in athletes. British Journal of Nutrition. 2017; 117:591-601. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1017/S0007114517000551.
  15. Kotko D, Honcharuk N. Zminy deiakykh antropometrychnykh pokaznykiv u sportsmeniv – lehkoatletiv na etapakh bahatorichnoi pidhotovky. Naukovyi chasopys NPU imeni N.P. Drahomanova. 2021;3(133):68-73. [in Ukrainian].
  16. Mountjoy M, Sundgot-Borgen J, Burke L, Ackerman KE, Blauwet C, Constantini N, et al. International Olympic Committee (IOC) Consensus Statement on Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (RED-S): 2018 Update. International Journal of Sports Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism. 2018;28(4):316-331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsnem.2018-0136.
  17. Sanchez-Munoz C, Muros JZ, Belmonte OL, Zabala M. Anthropometric characteristics, body composition and somatotype of elite male young runners. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17(2): E674. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijerph17020674.
  18. Suydam SM, Cortes DH, Axe MJ. Semitendinosus tendon for ACL reconstruction: regrowth and mechanical property recovery. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017; 5:2-11.
  19. Sanchez-Munoz C, Muros JZ. World and olympic mountain bike champions’ anthropometry, body composition and somatotype. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. 2018;58(6):843-51.
  20. Shaparenko PF. Antropometriia. Vinnytsia: Drukarnia Vinnytskoho derzhavnoho medychnoho universytetu im. M.I. Pyrohova; 2000. 71 s. [in Ukrainian].
  21. Kruskal WH, Wallis WA. Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1952;47(260):583- 621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2280779.
  22. Conover WJ, Iman RL. Multiple-comparisons procedures. Informal report. United States; 1979. Available from: https://www.osti.gov/ servlets/purl/ 6057803.
  23. Holovatskyi AS, Cherkasov VH, Sapin MR, Parakhin AI, Kovalchuk OI. Anatomiia liudyny. Vinnytsia: Nova knyha; 2018. 1200 s. [in Ukrainian].

Publication of the article:

«Bulletin of problems biology and medicine», 2023 Issue 2, 169, 424-431 pages, index UDC 611.982.087-057.875(477.85)

DOI:

10.29254/2077-4214-2023-2-169-424-431

2023 Issue 2, 169
anatomy mathematical model students thigh length
29.06.2023
Was this article helpful?
3
3