Vovk Yu. V., Hlushko T. R.

LITERATURE REVIEWS

Scentific article

The purpose of this article: analysis of special literature sources on the use of modern materials for optimization of correct intermaxillary position with fixed prosthetics of dentition defects in patients in prosthetic dentistry. The reproduction of harmonic intermaxillary relations is an important stage in prosthetic treatment since it is in charge of not only for patient comfort and stability of natural teeth but also for the functioning durability of established restoration on teeth and dental implants. When using registration materials, errors often occur at the laboratory stage of the prostheses design, which leads to fabrication of functionally inadequate restorations. To improve the clinical and laboratory reproduction of the prosthetic structures, it is important to get methodically efficient spatial relationship between the mandible and the maxilla with the help of registration materials. As of today, there is no adequate material for the registration of intermaxillary relations, therefore the issue of appropriate occlusal relation record becomes more relevant. In order to ensure a successful result of reproduction of the occlusal surfaces of the tooth ranges and to achieve the correct accuracy of the spatial intermaxillary relations, the accuracy of the spatial ratio of the upper and lower jaws should be made, with the registry being stable, identically reproducing the occlusal ratios in the oral cavity and on the working models set in the articulator and not altered during transportation. Most studies have shown significant difference among a variety of recording materials and techniques. In the review article, we have analyzed the methods of fixation of intermaxillary relations, as well as the positive and negative characteristics of modern registration materials that are mostly used in modern dental practice. Summarize our conducted review of modern materials and methods of registration of intermaxillary relations in the position of maximum intercuspation in patients, we can do next analytical conclusions: 1. In modern dental prosthetic practice the various clinical factors influence on the adequacy of registration of intermaxillary position. The results of the analysis of literary sources and our own scientific and practical researchs have shown that the main criterion in the selection of methods and material for intermaxillary positioning is the occlusal stability. 2. When replacing defects of hard tissues of teeth or produce single crowns on teeth or implants in patients with occlusive stability, the registration of the intermaxillary position should be carried out in the maximum intercuspation contact of teeth-antagonists. 3. For the reliable establishment of maximum intercuspation position in patients with partial loss of teeth, it is recommended to obtain a supporting occlusive pattern from a special acrylic plastic based on prepared teeth and soft tissues in the areas of adentia after tooth preparation. 4. In case of defects of hard tissues of separate teeth and the production of partial or complete crowns it is conduct determination of occlusive contacts of antagonist teeth, after the preparation of teeth, with the exception of the selected tooth surface (preferably distal), the re-substrate is obtained by polyvinylsiloxane (Futar D), compoundmass or special acrylic plastic, then the pre-preparation of the tooth and the re-substrate is specified in this area by the materials used. 5. In case of local defects of the crown part of the teeth, for produce of single crowns on the teeth and implants, the registration of maximum intercuspation is carried out by the clinical method of Shillingburg H. T. et al., 2008. 6. In case of distally limited defects of dentition caused by the loss of 1-2 teeth in the lateral and frontal parts of the jaws, the clinical method of Goldstein R. E., 2008 is used. 7. In case of common included and ended defects of the dentition on one or both jaws, a modified method of McCullock A. J., 2003 is used.

methods of recording of the сеntral occlusion, registration materials for intermaxillary fixation of the сеntral occlusion

1. Dawson PE. Functional Occlusion: From TMJ to Smile Design. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby; 2007. 311 p.
2. Campos AA, Nathanson A. Compressibility of two polyvinyl siloxane interocclusal record materials and its effect on mounted cast relationships. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 1999 Oct [cited 2018 June 22];82(4):456-61. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10512966
3. Megremis S, Tiba A, Vogt K. An evaluation of eight elastomeric occlusal registration materials. J Am Dent Assoc [Internet]. 2012 Dec [cited 2018 June 22];143(12):1358-60. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23204094
4. Nagrath R, Lahori M, Kumar V, Gupta V. A comparative study to evaluate the compression resistance of different interocclusal recording materials: an in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc [Internet]. 2014 Dec [cited 2018 June 22];14(1):76-85. Available from: https://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26199495 DOI: 10.1007/s13191-014-0369-8
5. Tejo SK, Kumar AG, Kattimani VS, Desai PD, Nalla S, Chaitanya KK. A comparative evaluation of dimensional stability of three types of interocclusal recording materials-an in-vitro multi-centre study. Head and Face Med [Internet]. 2012 Oct [cited 2018 June 22];8(27):1-9. Available from: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/23039395 DOI: 10.1186/1746-160X-8-27
6. McKee JR. Comparing condylar position repeatability for standardized versus nonstandardized methods of achieving centric relation. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 1997 Mar [cited 2018 June 22];77(3):280-4. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9069083
7. Davies S, Al-Ani Z, Jeremiah H, Winston D, Smith P. Reliability of recording static and dynamic occlusal contact marks using transparent acetate sheet. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2005 Nov [cited 2018 June 22];94(5):458-61. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16275307 DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.08.020
8. Haralur SB. Digital evaluation of functional occlusion parameters and their association with Temporomandibular disorders. J Clin Diagn Res [Internet]. 2013 Aug [cited 2018 June 22];7(8):1772-5. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24086910 DOI: 10.7860/ JCDR/2013/5602.3307
9. Kahn J, Tallents RH, Katzberg RW, Ross ME, Murphy WC. Prevalence of dental occlusal variables and intraarticular temporomandibular disorders: molar relationship, lateral guidance, and nonworking side contacts. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 1999 Oct [cited 2018 June 22];82(4):4105. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10512959
10. Hamdan B. Centric Relation. The Basic Reference. 2014 Oct 18 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.slideshare.net/Bahjat952/centricrelation
11. Cabral CW, Silva FA, Silva WA, Landulpho AB, Silva LB. Comparison between two methods to record occlusal contacts in habitual maximal intercuspation. Braz J Oral Sci [Internet]. 2006 Oct-Dec [cited 2018 June 22];5(19):1239-43. Available from: http://www.bioline.org.br/ pdf?os06043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v5i19.8642954
12. Ferreira AF, Henriques JC, Almeida GA, Machado AR, Machado NA, Fernandes Neto AJ. Comparative analysis between mandibular positions in centric relation and maximum intercuspation by cone beam computed tomography (CONE-BEAM). J Appl Oral Sci [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2018 June 22];17:27-34. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21499652
13. Schildkraut M, Wood DP, Hunter WS. The CR-CO discrepancy and its effect on cephalometric measurements. Angle Orthod. 1994;64:333-42.
14. Utt TW, Meyers CE, Jr, Wierzba TF, Hondrum SO. A three-dimensional comparison of condylar position changes between centric relation and centric occlusion using the mandibular position indicator. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop [Internet]. 1995 Mar [cited 2018 June 22];107(3):298-308. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7879763
15. Weffort SY, de Fantini SM. Condylar displacement between centric relation and maximum intercuspation in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. Angle Orthod [Internet]. 2010 Sep [cited 2018 June 22];80:835-42. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/20578853 DOI: 10.2319/090909-510.1
16. Fantini SM, Paiva JB, Rino Neto J, Dominguez GC, Abrão J, Vigoritto JW. Increase of condylar displacement between centric relation and maximal habitual intercuspation after occlusal splint therapy. Braz Oral Res [Internet]. 2005 July-Sept [cited 2018 June 22];19(3):176-82. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S180683242005000300004 DOI: 10.1590/S1806-83242005000300004
17. García VC, Cartagena GA, Sequeros GO. Evaluation of occlusal contacts in maximum intercuspation using the T-Scan system. J Oral Rehabil [Internet]. 1997 Dec [cited 2018 June 22];24(12):899-903. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9467991
18. McNamara JA, Seligman DA, Okeson JP. Occlusion, orthodontic treatment and temporomandibular disorders: A review. J Orofac Pain [Internet]. 1995 [cited 2018 June 22];9(1):73-90. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7581209
19. Academy of Prosthodontics. The Glossary of Prosthodontics terms, ed.7 [Internet]. St Louis: Mosby; 1999 [cited 2018 June 22]; 110 p. Available from: https://www.thejpd.org/article/S0022-3913(99)70234-9/abstract DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70234-9
20. MacDonald JW, Hannam AG. Relationship between occlusal contacts and jaw-closing muscle activity during tooth clenching: Part 1. J Prostate Dent [Internet]. 1984 Nov [cited 2018 June 22];52(5):718-28. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6593463
21. Dvornyk VM. Pidhotovka ta protezuvannia khvorykh na patolohichne styrannia tverdykh tkanyn zubiv [avtorefetat]. Poltava: Ukr. med. stom. akademiya; 2001. 22 s. [in Ukrainian].
22. Zablotskyi YaV, Dydyk NM. Poshyrenist` ta struktura defektiv zubnykh riadiv u naselennia m. Lvova ta L`vivskoi oblasti. Visnyk stom. 2005;4:7787. [in Ukrainian].
23. Korol` DM, Stupnytskyi RM, Hasiuk PA. Alhorytm morfolohichnoi perebudovy (adaptatsiyi) kistkovoi tkanyny al`veoliarnoho vidrostka pislia ekstrakciyi zubiv ta postiynoi diyi ortopedychnoi konstruktsiyi. Ukr. stom. almanakh. 2006;4:47-9. [in Ukrainian].
24. Voitsekhovska ОV. Klinichne ta laboratorne obhruntuvannia reabilitatsiyi zuboshchelepnoho aparatu pry odnostoronnikh neobmezhenykh defektakh zubnykh riadiv [avtoreferat]. Kyiv: Nats. med. un-t im. OO Bohomoltsia; 2008. 17 s. [in Ukrainian].
25. Atieh MA, Zadeh H, Stanford CM. Survival of short dental implants for treatment of posterior partial edentulism: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants [Internet]. 2012 Nov-Dec [cited 2018 June 22];27(6):1323-31. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/23189281
26. Turasi B, Ari-Demirkaya A, Biren S. Comparison of increased overjet cases and controls: normative data for condylar positions. J Oral Rehabil [Internet]. 2007 Feb [cited 2018 June 22];34(2):129-35. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17244235 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01691.x
27. Kerstein RB. Handbook of Research on Computerized Occlusal Analysis Technology Applications in Dental Medicine. USA: Med Inf Sci Refer; 2015. 4, T Scan-8 Recording Dynamics, System Features, and Clinical User Skills; 95-152.
28. Michalakis KX, Pissiotis A, Anastasiadou V, Kapari D. An experimental study on particular physical properties of several interocclusal recording media. Part I: consistency prior to setting. J Prosthodont. 2004 Sep;13(1):42-6.
29. Anup G, Ahila SC, VasanthaKumar M. Evaluation of dimensional stability, accuracy and surface hardness of interocclusal recording materials at various time intervals: an in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc [Internet]. 2011 Mar [cited 2018 June 22];11(1):26-31. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3095739/ DOI: 10.1007/s13191-011-0054-0
30. Michalakis KX, Pissiotis A, Anastasiadou V, Kapari D. An experimental study on particular physical properties of several interocclusal recording media. Part II: linear dimensional change and accompanying weight change. J Prosthodont. 2004 Feb;13(3):150-9.
31. Persson SK, Odén A, Andersson M, Sandborgh-Englund G. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness. Dent Mater [Internet]. 2009 Jul [cited 2018 June 22];25(7):929-36. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/19264353 DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.01.100
32. Keesee SM, Cameron SM, Lefler TB. Fabricating a simple closure guide for the dual-arch impression technique. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2001 Apr [cited 2018 June 22];85(4):418. Available from: https://europepmc.org/abstract/med/11319543 DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2001.114274
33. Barzilay I. The dual arch impression. Quintessence Int. 1987;18(4):293-5.
34. Lane DA, Randall RC, Lane NS, Wilson NH. A clinical trial to compare double-arch and complete-arch impression techniques in the provision of indirect restorations. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2003 Feb [cited 2018 June 22];89(2):141-5. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/12616233 DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2003.25
35. Soratur SH. New Essentials of Dental Materials, 1 ed. Jaypee Broth Med Publishers; 2007. 358 p.
36. Parker MH, Cameron SM, Hughbanks JC, Reid DE. Comparison of occlusal contacts in maximum intercuspation for two impression techniques. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 1997 Sep [cited 2018 June 22];78(3):255-9. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9297641
37. Wilson EG, Werrin SR. Double arch impressions for simplified restorative dentistry. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 1983 Feb [cited 2018 June 22];49(2):198-202. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6338215
38. Cameron SM, Whitlock WL, Tabor MS. Foreign body aspiration in dentistry: a review. J Am Dent Assoc [Internet]. 1996 Aug [cited 2018 June 22];127(8):1224-9. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8803399
39. Ando K, Kurosawa M, Fuwa Y, Kondo T, Goto S. A study on measuring occlusal contact area using silicone impression materials: an application of this method to the bite force measurement system using the pressure-sensitive sheet. Dent Mater J [Internet]. 2007 Nov [cited 2018 June 22];26(6):898-905. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18203497
40. Chan CA. Bite-management considerations for the restorative dentist. Dent Today [Internet]. 2008 Jan [cited 2018 June 22];27(1):110-3. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18240642
41. Chiche G, Pinault A. Esthetics of Anterior Fixed Prosthodontics. Chicago, IL: Quintessence; 1994. 118 p. 
42. Dawson PE, Arcan M. Attaining harmonic occlusion through visualized strain analysis. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 1981 Dec [cited 2018 June 22];46(6):615-22. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6946229
43. Dawson P. Evaluation, Diagnosis, and Treatments of Occlusal Problems. St. Louis, MO: C.V. Mosby; 1974. 284 p.
44. Fritzsche G. Efficient dynamic registration technique using metalbite presented with a Cerec 3D partial crown: a case description. Int J Comput Dent [Internet]. 2007 Jan [cited 2018 June 22];10(1):93-7. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17455772
45. Garg AK. Analyzing dental occlusion for implants: Tekscan’s TScan III . Dent Implantol Update [Internet]. 2007 Sep [cited 2018 June 22];18(9):6570. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17944069
46. Grel G. The Science and Art Of Porcelain Laminate Veneers. London: Quintessence; 2003. 297 p.
47. Kaplowitz GJ. Trouble-shooting dual arch impressions II. J Am Dent Assoc [Internet]. 1997 Sep [cited 2018 June 22];128(9):1277-81. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9297950
48. Kawano F. Maxillomandibular registration in removable partial dentures. Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi. 2007;51(2):231-40.
49. Luebbers HT, Messmer P, Obwegeser JA, Zwahlen RA, Kikinis R, Graetz KW, et al. Comparison of different registration methods for surgical navigation in cranio-maxillofacial surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg [Internet]. 2008 Mar [cited 2018 June 22];36(2):109-16. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18280173 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2007.09.002
50. Molson T. Recording vertical dimension of occlusion. J Prosthet Dent. 1960;10:258-9.
51. Mrazek B. Technical tips and clinical considerations. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2006;27(3):164-6.
52. Ratzmann A, Mundt T, Schwahn C, Langforth G, Hutzen D, Gedrange T, et al. Comparative clinical investigation of horizontal condylar inclination using the JMA electronic recording system and a protrusive wax record for setting articulators. Int J Comput Dent [Internet]. 2007 Jul [cited 2018 June 22];10(3):265-84. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18271499
53. Rudd K. Processing complete dentures. Dent Clin North Am [Internet]. 1996 Jan [cited 2018 June 22];40(1):121-49. Available from: https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8635618
54. Spear F. The role of temporization in interdisciplinary periodontal and orthodontic treatment. Advanc Esthet & Interdisciplin Dent. 2005;1(3):1-7.
55. Tanaka T. Esthetics and occlusion: you can’t have one without the other. J Mich Dent Assoc. 2003;85(4):60-22.
56. Touati B, Miara P, Nathanson D. Esthetic Dentistry & Ceramic Restorations. London: Martin Dunitz; 1999. 130 p.
57. Christensen GJ. Ensuring accuracy and predictability with double-arch impressions. J Am Dent Assoc [Internet]. 2008 Aug [cited 2018 June 22];139(8):1123-5. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18682627
58. Murray MC, Smith PW, Watts DC, Wilson NF. Occlusal registration: science or art?. Int Dent J [Internet]. 1999 Feb [cited 2018 June 22];49(1):416. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10887472
59. Powers JM, Wataha JC. Dental Materials: Properties and Manipulation, 10th ed. St. Louis, Missouri; 2014. 248 p.

«Bulletin of problems biology and medicine» Issue 3 (145), 2018 year, 13-21 pages, index UDK 616.314-089.29-631-02:616.314.2].002+615.46

10.29254/2077-4214-2018-3-145-13-21