POSSIBILITY FOR IMPROVED TECHNIQUE OF INDIRECT SINUS FLOOR LIFTING FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THE RANGE OF INDICATIONS (LITERATURE REVIEW)

  2. 2023
  3. POSSIBILITY FOR IMPROVED TECHNIQUE OF INDIRECT SINUS FLOOR LIFTING FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THE RANGE OF INDICATIONS (LITERATURE REVIEW)

Chernenko V. M., Yakymenko D. O.

POSSIBILITY FOR IMPROVED TECHNIQUE OF INDIRECT SINUS FLOOR LIFTING FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPANDING THE RANGE OF INDICATIONS (LITERATURE REVIEW)

Show/Download

About the author:

Chernenko V. M., Yakymenko D. O.

Heading:

LITERATURE REVIEWS

Type of article:

Scientific article

Annotation:

Dental prosthetics with dental implants is the most modern method of treating patients with adentia. The advantage of this method is that it avoids the preparation of teeth located near the defect area, which means that the load on the existing teeth is within the physiological norm, preventing their premature loss. In clinical practice, when planning and implementing dental implants, the most common problem is bone atrophy in the area of surgery. According to statistical data, in the post-extraction area, the width of the alveolar part of the jaw decreases by an average of 50% of the original volume during the first year. The degree of atrophy varies depending on the location of the defect, the intensity of metabolic processes, individual characteristics of the body, the initial characteristics of the bone and inflammatory and destructive changes that often precede tooth extraction. In cases of significant atrophy, additional surgical procedures are required to increase the volume of bone tissue in order to create conditions for dental implantation. Using the scientific search method of research, the data from literature sources on modern methods of bone augmentation (open and closed sinus lift) were processed, and the possibility of improving the closed sinus lift was analysed. In the presence of significant bone atrophy in the intervention area, which occurs in most clinical cases, the open sinus lift technique is preferred despite certain difficulties in its application. In this regard, it is advisable to expand the indications for closed sinus lift by considering the individual clinical characteristics of the surgical intervention area, minimising the risk of xenograft infection, reducing the rehabilitation period and financial burden on the patient. Based on the analysed scientific publications, the socio-medical significance and ways of implementing the improvement of closed sinus lift to expand its indications are determined.

Tags:

augmentation, dental implantation, indirect sinus floor lifting technique, osteogenic potential, osteoplastic material

Bibliography:

  1. Pavlenko OV, Sirenko OF, Ilyk RR. Optymizatsiia strokiv ortopedychnoho likuvannia chastkovykh defektiv zubnykh riadiv z oporoiu na vnutrishnokistkovi dentalni implantaty. Suchasna stomatolohiia. 2011;5:80–2. [in Ukrainian].
  2. Prots HB. Kompleksni metody khirurhichnoi pidhotovky khvorykh do ortopedychnoi reabilitatsii zalezhno vid stanu tkanyn proteznoho lozha [avtoreferat]. Ivano-Frankivsk: IFNMU; 2020. 40 s. [in Ukrainian].
  3. Pavlish IV. Klinichni ta tekhnolohichni aspekty kerovanoi khirurhii v stomatolohichnii implantolohii. Svit medytsyny ta biolohii. 2013;2:211– 5. Dostupno: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/klinichni-ta-tehnologichni-aspek ti-kerovanoyi-hirurgiyi-v-stomatologichniy-implantologiyi. [in Ukrainian].
  4. Pavlish IV, Dvornyk VM, Riabushko NO. Sposib vyhotovlennia khirurhichnoho shablona dlia vstanovlennia detalnykh implantativ. Ukrainskyi stomatolohichnyi almanakh. 2016;2(3):81–6. Dostupno: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sposib-vigotovlennya-hirurgichnogo-shablonadlya-vstanovlennya-dentalnih-implantativ. [in Ukrainian].
  5. Avetikov DS, Pronina OM, Lokes KP. Suchasni uiavlennia pro umovy, yaki obmezhuiut vybir metodu dentalnoi implantatsii na verkhnii i nyzhnii shchelepakh. Visnyk problem biolohii i medytsyny. 2017;3(4):20–6. [in Ukrainian].
  6. Avetikov DS, Krynychko LR, Stavytskyi SO. Khirurhichni etapy dentalnoi implantatsii (bazovyi kurs). Poltava: VDNZU «UMSA»; 2016. 108 s. Dostupno: http://repository.pdmu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/5646. [in Ukrainian].
  7. Malanchuk VA, Mammadov EA. Bezposerednia dentalna implantatsiia. Kyiv: TsSTRI, filiia №7; 2008. 157 s. [in Ukrainian].
  8. Pavlenko OV, Sirenko OF. Udoskonalennia ortopedychnykh stomatolohichnykh zakhodiv u kompleksnii reabilitatsii patsiientiv z chastkovymy defektamy zubnykh riadiv z vykorystanniam vnutrishnokistkovykh dentalnykh implantativ (ohliad literatury). Suchasna stomatolohiia. 2011;4:97–9. [in Ukrainian].
  9. Demetoglu U, Ocak H, Songur T. Which dental implant surface is more effective in osteointegration: RBM surface versus SLA surface. Annals of Clinical and Analytical Medicine. 2021;7(12):736–9. Dostupno: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12868/1631.
  10. Apiekunov HYu, Yefymenko AS, Bilyi SM. Problemy protezuvannia patsiientiv iz zastosuvanniam stomatolohichnykh implantativ. Ukrainskyi stomatolohichnyi almanakh. 2013;1:112–5. Dostupno: . [in Ukrainian].
  11. Tetè S, Mastrangelo F, Traini T. A Macro- and Nanostructure Evaluation of a Novel Dental Implant. Implant Dentistry. 2008;17(3):309-320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/id.0b013e318182d494.
  12. Khachatryan L, Khachatryan G, Hakobyan G. Simultaneous endoscopic endonasal sinus surgery and sinus augmentation with immediate implant placement: A retrospective clinical study of 23 patients. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. 2019;47(8):1233–41.
  13. Shalu CB, Ramesh RF, Komal M. Maxillary sinus augmentation. Indian Society of Periodontology. 2018;6(22):468–73.
  14. Shpachynskyi OS, Skibitskyi VS, Kopchak AV. Vyvchennia arkhitektoniky kistkovoi tkanyny v diliankakh subantralnoi auhmentatsii z vykorystanniam ksenohennykh kistkovozamishchuiuchykh materialiv. Suchasna stomatolohiia. 2018;2:42–6. DOI: https://doi. org/10.33295/1992-576X-2018-2-42-46. [in Ukrainian].
  15. Molina A, Sanz-Sanchez I, Sanz-Martin I. Complications in sinus lifting procedures: Classification and management. Periodontology 2000. 2022;1(88):103–15.
  16. Castilla IK. Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using Growth Factors and Collagen Membranes [dissertation]. Spain, Granada. 2013. 127 p.
  17. Chernenko VM, Liubchenko OV. Mozhlyvist vykorystannia metodyky bezposerednoi implantatsii z nehainym navantazhenniam z vykorystanniam osteoplastychnykh ksenohennykh materialiv. Zhurnal klinichnykh ta eksperymentalnykh medychnykh doslidzhen. 2017;5(4):995–1005. [in Ukrainian].
  18. Kohli N, Stoddart JC, Arkel RJ. The limit of tolerable micromotion for implant osseointegration: a systematic review. Scientific Reports volume. 2021;11:10797. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90142-5.
  19. Kinash YuO, Kinash LV, Honcharov KV. Kompleksnyi pidkhid do likuvannia khvorykh iz atrofiieiu alveoliarnoho vidrostka pry zakhvoriuvanniakh tkanyn parodonta z apikalnymy uskladnenniamy: vid zastosuvannia kistkovoi auhmentatsii do vidnovlennia funktsionalnoi okliuzii. Ukrainskyi stomatolohichnyi almanakh. 2021;2:19–26. [in Ukrainian].
  20. Misch CE. Dental implant prosthetics. St. Louis: Elsevier mosby; 2005. 648 p.
  21. Pavlish IV. Obhruntuvannia vykorystannia maloinvazyvnoi metodyky dentalnoi implantatsii u bokovykh viddilakh nyzhnoi shchelepy za umovy defitsytu kistkovoi tkanyny [dysertatsiya]. Poltava: UMSA; 2021. 185 s. [in Ukrainian].
  22. Mysula IR, Skochylo OV. Kistkovo-plastychni materialy dlia zamishchennia defektiv shchelep: vid istorii do sohodennia. Shpytalna khirurhiia. Zhurnal imeni L. Ya. Kovalchuka. 2013;3:96–101. [in Ukrainian].
  23. Fragogeorgi EA, Rouchota M, Loudos G. In vivo imaging techniques for bone tissue engineering. Journal of Tissue Engineering. 2019;10:2041731419854586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2041731419854 586.
  24. Gholami M, Solmaz P, Farzaneh A. Angiogenesis around dental implants augmented by autogenous, xenogenous, and synthetic bone graft materials: an animal study in dogs. Teikyo Medical Journal. 2022;45(8):7299–308.
  25. Lutsyk OD, Chaikovskyi YuB. Histolohiia. Tsytolohiia. Vinnytsia: Nova knyha; 2018. 592 s. [in Ukrainian].
  26. Smektala T, Tutak M, Yendzheievski M. Biolohichni osnovy osteointehratsii. Implantolohiia Paradontolohiia Osteolohiia. 2014;4:26–9. [in Ukrainian].
  27. Fioravanti C, Frustaci I, Armellin E. Autologous blood preparations rich in platelets, fibrin and growth factors. Oral Implantology. 2016;8(4):96- 113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11138%2Forl%2F2015.8.4.096.
  28. Haiduk RV, Horytskyi VM, Khomych NM. Zastosuvannia osteoplastychnoho materialu “Hialuost” pry khirurhichnomu likuvanni retentsii ta dystopii nyzhnikh tretikh moliariv. Medychna hidrolohiia ta reabilitatsiia. 2011;9(4). Dostupno: http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/1234 56789/41287. [in Ukrainian].
  29. Makeiev VF, Cherpak MO. Zastosuvannia polimernykh osteoplastychnykh materialiv u stomatolohii. Ukrainskyi stomatolohichnyi almanakh. 2013;1:116–9. Dostupno: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zastosuvannya-polimernih-osteoplastichnih-materialiv-u-stomatologiyi. [in Ukrainian].
  30. Skochylo OV, Mysula IR, Datsko VA. Porivnialna kharakterystyka vplyvu osteoplastychnoho materialu na osnovi hidroksyapatytu ta polilaktydu na osteoreheneratyvni protsesy v defektakh nyzhnikh shchelep. Visnyk naukovykh doslidzhen. 2014;1:71–4. [in Ukrainian].
  31. Linkevicius T, Puisys A, Linkeviciene L. Crestal Bone Stability around Implants with Horizontally Matching Connection after Soft Tissue Thickening: A Prospective Clinical Trial. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2013;17(3):497-508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ cid. 12155.
  32. Flis PS, Omelchuk NA, Rashchenko NV. Ortodontiia. Vinnytsia: Nova knyha; 2007. 312 s. [in Ukrainian].
  33. Shumynskyi YeV. Kliniko-anatomichne ta biomekhanichne obgruntuvannia metodiv khirurhichnoho likuvannia perelomiv verkhnoi shchelepy [dysertatsiya]. Kyiv: Natsionalʹnyy medychnyy universytet imeni O. O. Bohomolʹtsya; 2021. 235 s. [in Ukrainian].
  34. Kostenko YeYa, Kostenko SB, Stetsyk MO. Funktsionalna anatomiia ta komponenty zhuvalnoho aparatu. Uzhhorod; 2020. 90 s. [in Ukrainian].
  35. Rybak VA, Kopchak AV. Suchasni mozhlyvosti ta perspektyvy zastosuvannia Cad/Cam tekhnolohii v likuvanni khvorykh iz defektamy i deformatsiiamy kistok lytsevoho cherepa. Travma. 2015;16(3):71–8. Dostupno: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Travma_2015_16_3_14. [in Ukrainian].
  36. Buts YuV, Ivashura AA, Leukhina LV. Biolohiia: praktykum dlia slukhachiv pidhotovchoho viddilennia. Kharkiv; 2020. Dostupno: http:// repository.hneu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/23856. [in Ukrainian].
  37. Hryhorieva NV, Diedukh NV, Parubets MM. Postimmobilizatsiinyi osteoporoz: ohliad literatury ta seriia klinichnykh vypadkiv. Bil Suhloby Khrebet. 2022;3:94–107. [in Ukrainian].
  38. Soleiko DS, Konoplitskyi VS, Kovalchuk BM. Dyspersiia dielektrychnoi pronyklyvosti, yak diahnostychnyi parametr strukturnykh zmin u biolohichnykh obiektakh. Visnyk morfolohii. 2005;2(11):331–7. [in Ukrainian].

Publication of the article:

«Bulletin of problems biology and medicine», 2023 Issue 4, 171, 82-89 pages, index UDC 616.314-089.23

DOI:

10.29254/2077-4214-2023-4-171-82-89

2023 Issue 4, 171
augmentation dental implantation indirect sinus floor lifting technique osteogenic potential osteoplastic material
22.12.2023
Was this article helpful?
3
3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.