MODERN ADHESIVE SYSTEMS AND TECHNIQUES OF THEIR APPLICATION FOR DIRECT RESTORATION OF HARD DENTAL TISSUES DEFECTS

  2. 2023
  3. MODERN ADHESIVE SYSTEMS AND TECHNIQUES OF THEIR APPLICATION FOR DIRECT RESTORATION OF HARD DENTAL TISSUES DEFECTS

Pompii O. O., Kerimova T. M., Pompii E. S.

MODERN ADHESIVE SYSTEMS AND TECHNIQUES OF THEIR APPLICATION FOR DIRECT RESTORATION OF HARD DENTAL TISSUES DEFECTS

Show/Download

About the author:

Pompii O. O., Kerimova T. M., Pompii E. S.

Heading:

LITERATURE REVIEWS

Type of article:

Scientific article

Annotation:

The widespread use of adhesive systems in many branches of modern dentistry is often accompanied by complications associated with their physical, mechanical and biological characteristics, mistakes at the stages of adhesive preparation, and the irrational choice of bonding agents for individual clinical situations. The work aimed to study the known physical, mechanical and clinical properties of modern adhesive systems, the latest trends and approaches to their improvement, and prospects for the further development of restorative dentistry. The most popular adhesive systems for direct photocomposite restorations remain bonds of the V and VII generations, which are used according to the classic protocols of total etching or self-etching, respectively. The obtained results of laboratory and clinical studies of these adhesive systems are often contradictory and emphasize the problem of creating a reliable connection between the photocomposite and the dentin of the teeth. In order to increase the clinical effectiveness of direct photocomposite restorations, universal adhesive systems and self-adhesive composites were developed, which have extended indications for use in certain clinical situations and significantly simplify adhesive preparation. However, the existing experience of using these new materials also demonstrates the development of complications, even in the short period of operation of restorations. To date, no adhesive systems have an optimal set of physicomechanical and clinical characteristics for the direct restoration of defects in the hard tissues of teeth with photocomposite materials. The known results of laboratory and clinical studies of similar adhesive systems demonstrate significant discrepancies regarding the indicators of adhesive strength, the tightness of the dentin-photocomposite interface, the success of restorations, which is explained by the lack of standardized methods of their testing and clear criteria for evaluating clinical effectiveness.

Tags:

adhesive preparation technique, adhesive strength, adhesive systems, clinical effectiveness, photocomposite restorations

Bibliography:

  1. Udod OA, Borysenko OM. Stan fotokompozytsiinykh vidnovlen zubiv u riznykh umovakh svitlovoi polimeryzatsii adhezyvnoi systemy. Ukrainskii stomatolohichnii almanakh. 2019;1:16-9. [in Ukrainian].
  2. Parsaie Z, Firouzmandi M, Mohammadi N. Evaluating the Effect of Pretreatment with Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitors on the Shear Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Primary Teeth Dentin: A 6-Month In vitro Study. Contemp Clin Dent [Internet]. 2021 Oct-Dec [cited 2023 Jul 18];12(4):408-13. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/350 68841/. DOI: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_662_20.
  3. Brailko NM. Terapevtychni aspekty analizu adhezyvnykh system. Aktualni problemy suchasnoi medytsyny. 2018;2(62):294-300. [in Ukrainian].
  4. Udod OA, Moroz IO. Pryami fotokompozytsiini vidnovlenya zubiv: stan ta porushenya. Inovatsii v stomatolohii. 2022;1:19-24. [in Ukrainian].
  5. Paschoini VL, Ziotti IR, Neri CR, Corona SAM, Souza-Gabriel AE. Chitosan improves the durability of resin-dentin interface with etch-andrinse or self-etch adhesive systems. J Appl Oral Sci [Internet]. 2021 Dec [cited 2023 Jul 18];29:e20210356. Available from: https://pubmed. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ 34910075/. DOI: 10.1590/1678-7757-2021-0356.
  6. Steiner R, Edelhoff D, Stawarczyk B, Dumfahrt H, Lente I. Effect of Dentin Bonding Agents, Various Resin Composites and Curing Modes on Bond Strength to Human Dentin. Materials (Basel) [Internet]. 2019 Oct 17 [cited 2023 Jul 18];12(20):3395. Available from: https://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pmc/articles/PMC6829412/. DOI: 10.3390/ma12203395.
  7. Schärer BM, Peutzfeldt A. Impact of adhesive application errors on dentin bond strength of resin composite. Biomater Investig Dent [Internet]. 2022 Nov 7 [cited 2023 Jul 19];9(1):101-9. Available from: . DOI: 10.1080/26415275.2022.2138405.
  8. Hardan L, Bourgi R, Cuevas-Suárez CE, Devoto W, Zarow M, Monteiro P, et al. Effect of Different Application Modalities on the Bonding Performance of Adhesive Systems to Dentin: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cells [Internet]. 2023 Jan 3 [cited 2023 Jul 19];12(1):190. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36611983/. DOI: 10.3390/cells12010190.
  9. Mochalov YuO, Lokota OV. Doslidzhennya adhezii do struktur zuba universalnogo mikrihibrydnoho kompozytnoho stomatolohichnoho restavratsiinoho materialu “Dzhen-Radians”. Molodyi vchenyi. 2018;8(60):298-301. [in Ukrainian].
  10. ISO 11405:2015 – «Dentistry – Testing of adhesion to tooth structure» [Internet]. Geneva: ISO; 2015 Feb [cited 2023 Jul 19]. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/62898.html.
  11. Avakov VV. Zastosuvannya rastrovoi elektronnoi mikroskopii dlya obgruntuvannya dotsilnosti vykorystannya adhezyvnoi tekhniky v postiinykh zubakh u ditei, shcho prozhyvayut v umovakh tekhnohennoho zabrudnennya solyamy vazhkykh metaliv. Visnyk problem biolohii i medytsyny. 2019;2(150):233-6. [in Ukrainian].
  12. Vilde T, Stewart CA, Finer Y. Simulating the Intraoral Aging of Dental Bonding Agents: A Narrative Review. Dent J (Basel) [Internet]. 2022 Jan 15 [cited 2023 Jul 19];10(1):13. Available from: . DOI: 10.3390/dj10010013.
  13. Ismail AM, Bourauel C, ElBanna A, Salah Eldin T. Micro versus Macro Shear Bond Strength Testing of Dentin-Composite Interface Using Chisel and Wireloop Loading Techniques. Dent J (Basel) [Internet]. 2021 Nov 30 [cited 2023 Jul 19];9(12):140. Available from: . DOI: 10.3390/dj9120140.
  14. Junior LR, Baroudi K, Barroso LS, Miranda ME, Vitti RP, Brandt WC. Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to dentin using different adhesion protocols. J Clin Exp Dent [Internet]. 2022 Jan 1 [cited 2023 Jul 20];14(1):35-9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/35070122/. DOI: 10.4317/jced.59043.
  15. Daher R, Krejci I, Mekki M, Marin C, Di Bella E, Ardu S. Effect of Multiple Enamel Surface Treatments on Micro-Shear Bond Strength. Polymers (Basel) [Internet]. 2021 Oct 18 [cited 2023 Jul 20];13(20):3589. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34685348/. DOI: 10.3390/polym13203589.
  16. Gupta A, Tavane P, Gupta PK, Tejolatha B, Lakhani AA, Tiwari R, et al. Evaluation of Microleakage with Total Etch, Self-Etch and Universal Adhesive Systems in Class V Restorations: An In vitro Study. J Clin Diagn Res [Internet]. 2017 Apr [cited 2023 Jul 20];11(4):53-6. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28571262/. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/ 24907.9680.
  17. Sengar EV, Mulay S, Beri L, Gupta A, Almohareb T, Binalrimal S, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Flowable Composite Resin Using Etch and Rinse, Self-Etch Adhesive Systems, and Self-Adhesive Flowable Composite Resin in Class V Cavities: Confocal Laser Microscopic Study. Materials (Basel) [Internet]. 2022 Jul 16 [cited 2023 Jul 20];15(14):4963. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/pmc/ articles/PMC9319247/. DOI: 10.3390/ma15144963.
  18. Bhupanapadu N, Sattar MA, Deb A. Evaluation of Nanoleakage Depth and Pattern of Cervical Restorations Bonded with Different Adhesive Systems. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent [Internet]. 2022 May-Jun [cited 2023 Jul 20];15(3):299-303. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pmc/articles/PMC 9357532/. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2391.
  19. Bekuzarova KhI. Kliniko-laboratorne obgruntuvannya optymizatsii adhezyvnoi tekhniky vidnovlennya zubiv [avtoreferat dysertatsii]. Kyiv: Nats. med. akad. pislyadyplom. osvity im. Shupika; 2018. 24 s. [in Ukrainian].
  20. Vukelja J, Klarić Sever E, Sever I, Jukić Krmek S, Tarle Z. Effect of Conventional Adhesive Application or Co-Curing Technique on Dentin Bond Strength. Materials (Basel) [Internet]. 2021 Dec 12 [cited 2023 Jul 21];14(24):7664. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ 34947259/. DOI: 10.3390/ma14247664.
  21. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Van Landuyt K, Yoshida Y, Peumans M. From Buonocore’s Pioneering Acid-Etch Technique to SelfAdhering Restoratives. A Status Perspective of Rapidly Advancing Dental Adhesive Technology. J Adhes Dent [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Jul 21];22(1):7-34. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32030373/. DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a43994.
  22. Haak R, Werner MS, Schneider H, Häfer M, Schulz-Kornas E. Clinical Outcomes and Quantitative Margin Analysis of a Universal Adhesive Using a Randomized Clinical Trial over Three Years. J Clin Med [Internet]. 2022 Nov 23 [cited 2023 Jul 21];11(23):6910. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36498485/. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11236910.
  23. Bakry AS, Abbassy MA. Application Modes Affect Two Universal Adhesive Systems’ Nanoleakage Expression and Shear Bond Strength. Biomed Res Int [Internet]. 2021 Sep 30 [cited 2023 Jul 21];2021:7375779. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34631886/. DOI: 10.1155/2021/7375779.
  24. Raji Z, Hosseini M, Kazemian M. Micro-shear bond strength of composite to deep dentin by using mild and ultra-mild universal adhesives. Dent Res J (Isfahan) [Internet]. 2022 Jun 1 [cited 2023 Jul 21];19:44. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35915717/.
  25. Jafarnia S, Zeinaddini MJ, Zandkarimi F, Saberi S, Shahabi S, Valanezhad A, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Microtensile Bond Strength of Three Adhesive Systems. Front Dent [Internet]. 2022 Feb 6 [cited 2023 Jul 21];19:8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/35937153/. DOI: 10.18502/fid.v19i8.8725.
  26. Vasconcelos EС, Delgado AHS, Félix S, Brito J, Gonçalves L, Polido M. Improving Properties of an Experimental Universal Adhesive by Adding a Multifunctional Dendrimer (G-IEMA): Bond Strength and Nanoleakage Evaluation. Polymers (Basel) [Internet]. 2022 Apr 3 [cited 2023 Jul 22];14(7):1462. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35406335/. DOI: 10.3390/polym14071462.
  27. Hardan L, Orsini G, Bourgi R, Cuevas-Suárez CE, Nicastro M, Lazarescu F. Effect of Active Bonding Application after Selective Dentin Etching on the Immediate and Long-Term Bond Strength of Two Universal Adhesives to Dentin. Polymers (Basel) [Internet]. 2022 Mar 11 [cited 2023 Jul 22];14(6):1129. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35335459/. DOI: 10.3390/polym14061129.
  28. Almeida RAM, Lima SNL, Nassif MV, Mattos NHR, Matos TP, Jesus TRR, et al. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of a new universal adhesive applied in the “no-waiting” technique: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig [Internet]. 2023 Jan [cited 2023 Jul 22];27(1):151-163. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36068369/. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-022-04703-7.
  29. Shaalan OO, Abou-Auf E. A 24-Month Evaluation of Self-Adhering Flowable Composite Compared to Conventional Flowable Composite in Conservative Simple Occlusal Restorations: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Contemp Clin Dent [Internet]. 2021 Oct-Dec [cited 2023 Jul 24];12(4):368-375. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35068835/. DOI: 10.4103/ccd.ccd _600_20.
  30. Inglês M, Vasconcelos ECJ, Mano AA, Polido M, Delgado AHS. Comparative Assessment of Different Pre-Treatment Bonding Strategies to Improve the Adhesion of Self-Adhesive Composites to Dentin. Polymers (Basel) [Internet]. 2022 Sep 21 [cited 2023 Jul 24];14(19):3945. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36235894/. DOI: 10.3390/polym 14193945.
  31. Borysenko OM. Udoskonalennya pidkhodiv do zastosuvannya adhezyvnykh system dlya vidnovlennya zubiv fotokompozytsiinymy materialamy [anotatsia dysertatsii]. Lyman: Donetsk. nats. med. univer.; 2020. 14 s. [in Ukrainian].

Publication of the article:

«Bulletin of problems biology and medicine», 2023 Issue 3, 170, 98-109 pages, index UDC 616.314-085-74

DOI:

10.29254/2077-4214-2023-3-170-98-109

2023 Issue 3, 170
adhesive preparation technique adhesive strength adhesive systems clinical effectiveness photocomposite restorations
01.10.2023
Was this article helpful?
3
2

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.