Ivanov R. O., Zverkhanovskyi O. A., Sarafiniuk L. A., Androshchuk O. V., Tatarina O. V.

MAIN METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF DETERMINING THE CHEWING EFFICIENCY

---

Show/Download

About the author:

Ivanov R. O., Zverkhanovskyi O. A., Sarafiniuk L. A., Androshchuk O. V., Tatarina O. V.

Heading:

LITERATURE REVIEWS

Type of article:

Scientific article

Annotation:

In modern dentistry, one of the problems that needs to be urgently addressed is the determination and evaluation of masticatory efficiency, in particular, a reliable assessment of masticatory pressure at the time of occlusion. Occlusion is a system of integrated structures that ensure the interconnection of tooth contacts, which is based on the morphological and functional state of the maxillary joint and the neuromuscular system in general. The purpose of our study is to analyse the existing data on methods for determining and evaluating chewing efficiency, in particular, bite force and chewing pressure in people of different ages and genders. We conducted a systematic review and analysis of the literature with a depth of 10 years based on PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of science, UpToDate databases. Solving the problem of determining and evaluating chewing efficiency is of direct practical importance for orthopedic and orthodontic treatment, and scientific and practical interest in solving this problem is observed in such fields as human anatomy and physiology, nutrition and pharmacology. Bite force and chewing pressure are studied using various measurement methods: gnathodynamometry; electromyography; muscle sedation with appropriate drugs to determine chewing efficiency; use of strain gauges to determine electrical resistance, fibre optic Bragg gratings, piezoelectric pressure transducers; occlusiography. However, according to the results of our literature analysis, we found that there is no structured approach to comparing different methods for determining indicators of chewing function, taking into account the age and gender characteristics of the subjects.

Tags:

Bibliography:

1. Gajapathi B, Rangarajan V, Yogesh P, Ibrahim M, Kumar R, Karthik P. Concepts of occlusion in prosthodontics: A literature review, part I. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2015;15(3):200. DOI: 10.4103/0972-4052.165172.
2. Bulanda S, Ilczuk-Rypuła D, Nitecka-Buchta A, Nowak Z, Baron S, Postek-Stefańska L. Sleep bruxism in children: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment – a literature review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(18):9544. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18189544.
3. Hama Y, Hosoda A, Kubota C, Guo R, Soeda H, Yamaguchi K, et al. Factors related to masticatory performance in junior and senior high school students and young adults: a cross-sectional study. J Prosthodont Res. 2022;36:424-429. DOI: 10.2186/jpr.jpr_d_22_00137.
4. Gu Y, Bai Y, Xie X. Bite force transducers and measurement devices. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9:9. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.665081.
5. Vilela M, Picinato-Pirola MN, Giglio LD, Anselmo-Lima WT, Valera FC, Trawitzki LV, et al. Força de mordida em crianças com mordida cruzada posterior. Audiol Commun Res. 2017;22:e1723. DOI: 10.1590/2317-6431-2016-1723.
6. Mehendale N, Gohel V. Review on electromyography signal acquisition, processing and its applications. SSRN Electron J. 2020;12:1361- 1367 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3598928.
7. Abe I, Milczewski MS, Souza MA, Kalinowski HJ, Machuca OF, Marin GC, Camargo ES. The force magnitude of a human bite measured at the molar intercuspidation using fiber Bragg gratings. J Microw Optoelectron Electromagn Appl. 2017;16(2):434-444. DOI: 10.1590/2179- 10742017 v16i2808.
8. Shiga H, Komino M, Uesugi H, Sano M, Yokoyama M, Nakajima K, et al. Comparison of two dental prescale systems used for the measurement of occlusal force. Odontology. 2020;108(4):676-80. DOI: 10.1007/s10266-020-00509-9.
9. Padma S, Umesh S, Asokan S, Srinivas T. Bite force measurement based on fiber Bragg grating sensor. J Biomed Opt. 2017;22(10):1. DOI: 10.1117/1.jbo.22.10.107002.
10. Araujo DS, Marquezin MC, Barbosa TD, Gavião MB, Castelo PM. Evaluation of masticatory parameters in overweight and obese children. Eur J Orthod. 2015;38(4):393-7. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjv092.
11. Nimura K, Shiga H, Yokoyama M. Relationships of physical constitution with occlusal force and masticatory performance in adults with natural dentition. Odontology. 2023;111:1018-1024 DOI: 10.1007/s10266-023-00803-2.
12. Katrenova Z, Alisherov S, Yergibay M, Kappasov Z, Blanc W, Tosi D, et al. Bite force mapping based on distributed fiber sensing network approach. Sensors. 2024;24(2):537. DOI: 10.3390/s24020537.
13. Khan F, Donder A, Galvan S, Baena FR, Misra S. Pose measurement of flexible medical instruments using fiber bragg gratings in multicore fiber. IEEE Sens J. 2020;20(18):10955-10962. DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2020.2993452.
14. Loranger S, Gagné M, Lambin-Iezzi V, Kashyap R. Rayleigh scatter based order of magnitude increase in distributed temperature and strain sensing by simple UV exposure of optical fibre. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1):1-7. DOI: 10.1038/srep11177.
15. Sattayasoonthorn P, Suthakorn J, Chamnanvej S. On the feasibility of a liquid crystal polymer pressure sensor for intracranial pressure measurement. Biomed Eng Biomed Tech. 2019;64(5):543-53. DOI: 10.1515/bmt-2018-0029.
16. Song P, Si C, Zhang M, Zhao Y, He Y, Liu W, et al. A novel piezoresistive MEMS pressure sensors based on temporary bonding technology. Sensors. 2020;20(2):337. DOI: 10.3390/s20020337.
17. Peng X, Hu L, Liu W, Fu X. Model-Based analysis and regulating approach of air-coupled transducers with spurious resonance. Sensors. 2020;20(21):6184. DOI: 10.3390/s20216184.
18. Rosier PF. Good urodynamic practice: Pressure signal quality immediately after catheter insertion for cystometry with a water‐filled pressure transducer system and its relevance for the ICS zero procedure. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020;40:319-325. DOI: 10.1002/nau.24561.
19. Assery MK, Albusaily HS, Pani SC, Aldossary MS. Bite force and occlusal patterns in the mixed dentition of children with down syndrome. J Prosthodont. 2020;29(6):472-8. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.13186.
20. Verma TP. Bite force recording devices - A review. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(9):ZE01-ZE05. DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2017/27379.10450.
21. de Abreu RA, Pereira MD, Furtado F, Prado GP, Mestriner W, Ferreira LM. Masticatory efficiency and bite force in individuals with normal occlusion. Arch Oral Biol. 2014;59(10):1065-1074. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2014. 05.005.
22. Edmonds HM, Glowacka H. The ontogeny of maximum bite force in humans. J Anat. 2020;237:529-542. DOI: 10.1111/joa.13218.
23. Arakawa I, Abou‐Ayash S, Genton L, Tsuga K, Leles CR, Schimmel M. Reliability and comparability of methods for assessing oral function: chewing, tongue pressure and lip force. J Oral Rehabil. 2020;47(7):862-71. DOI: 10.1111/joor.12976.
24. Todic J, Martinovic B, Pavlovic J, Tabakovic S, Staletovic M. Assessment of the impact of temporomandibular disorders on maximum bite force. Biomed Pap. 2019;163(3):274-8. DOI: 10.5507/bp.2019.001.
25. Guo R, Hama Y, Hosoda A, Kubota C, Minakuchi S. Age and sex differences in oral functions from junior high school to young adulthood: a cross-sectional study. J Oral Rehabil. 2021;48:1373-1379. DOI: 10.1111/joor.13253.
26. Chong MX, Khoo CD, Goh KH, Rahman F, Shoji Y. Effect of age on bite force. J Oral Sci. 2016;58(3):361-3. DOI: 10.2334/josnusd.15-0675.
27. Jayakumar P, FelsyPremila G, Muthu M, Kirubakaran R, Panchanadikar N, Al-Qassar S. Bite force of children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023;47:39-53. DOI: 10.22514/jocpd. 2023.022.
28. Al-Gunaid T. Bite force - What we should know: a literature review. Int J Orthod Rehabil. 2019;10(4):168. DOI: 10.4103/ijor.ijor_33_19.
29. Huang YF, Wang CM, Shieh WY, Liao YF, Hong HH, Chang CT. The correlation between two occlusal analyzers for the measurement of bite force. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1):472. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-022-02484-9.
30. Godinho RM, Fitton LC, Toro-Ibacache V, Stringer CB, Lacruz RS, Bromage TG, et al. The biting performance of Homo sapiens and Homo heidelbergensis. J Hum Evol. 2018;118:56-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2018. 02.010.

Publication of the article:

«Bulletin of problems biology and medicine», 2024 Issue 1, 172, 24-29 pages, index UDC 616.314.2

DOI:

10.29254/2077-4214-2024-1-172-24-29