Zelinka-Khobzey M. M., Tarasenko K. V.

LITERATURE REVIEWS

Scentific article

This review article is aimed at highlighting and analyzing the manifestations of endothelial dysfunction in overweight pregnant women that has been recognized as one of the most challenging issues in current obstetrics. Obesity has already been stated as one of the most widespread diseases around the world. According to the World Health Organization, more than 25% of women are diagnosed as overweight, and there is a tendency toward an increase in the obesity incidence in pregnant women. Obesity in pregnant women can cause maternal and prenatal complications, and namely, pre-eclampsia, miscarriage, placental dysfunction, fetus intrauterine growth retardation. In Ukraine, preeclampsia occurs in 12-17% of cases and develops in 8-12% of healthy pregnant women and in 20-40% of pregnant women with intercurrent pathology. Therefore, determining the causes of preeclampsia in pregnant women with concomitant obesity is an important task. The trigger mechanism for the development of this complication of pregnancy results from the endothelial damage to the vessels in the pre-pregnancy period and is typically associated with such factors as arterial hypertension, obesity, dyslipidemia. The development of placental dysfunction and its clinical manifestations including intrauterine growth retardation syndrome and chronic fetal distress is an essential aspect in the course of pregnancy that causes high prenatal morbidity and mortality. The placental process starts with the interaction between the cytotrophoblast and the decidual tissue of the endometrium. The intensity of utero-placental blood flow is the main factor determining the oxygen supply to the placenta. In the case of uncomplicated pregnancy, placental vessels are dilated and do not respond to contractile stimuli that ensures smooth regular supply of oxygen and nutrients to the fetus. Endothelial dysfunction is a universal pathogenetic mechanism of most diseases, as the endothelium not only regulates the vascular tone, but also takes part in the processes of atherogenesis, thrombosis, and provides the protection of the vascular wall the integrity. In addition, the endothelium produces a large number of biologically active substances that affect the tone and vascular angiogenesis, regulate hemostasis, immune and anti-inflammatory response. The reduction in the synthesis of nitric oxide (NO), which is the main vasodilator, and also is involved in the functioning of various systems of the human body, and in particular, cardiovascular, immune, and endocrine, is considered as a key element of endothelial dysfunction. Nitric oxide is derived from L-arginine under the action of the NO-synthase enzyme. It is the L-arginine – NO system that according to the current views in obstetrics plays a leading vasoregulatory role during the gestation. The presence of endothelial dysfunction in pregnant women with preeclampsia can be due to the low level of substances responsible for vasodilation. Consequently, obesity in women of child-bearing age is associated with a number of systemic and reproductive problems that leads to a decrease in fertility. Pregnancy and childbirth are complicated by preeclampsia, the threat of abortion, miscarriage and intrauterine damage of the fetus. All this indicates a further need to improve measures aimed at prenatal fetal protection and reducing the frequency of maternal and fetal complications in this group of pregnant women, and states the necessity for early detection of women with an increased risk of placental syndromes (preeclampsia, fetal delay, etc.).

obesity, pregnancy, endothelial dysfunction, preeclampsia.

1. Ogienko VP. Statisticheskiye dannyye po vyzhivaniyu v Ukraine i za rubezhom [Internet]. Dostupno: http://medstat.gov.u/ukr [in Russiаn].
2. Vinnik NI, Kaidashev IP. Clinical description of effectiveness pioglitazone in complex therapy on patients with ischemic heart disease with metabolic syndrome. Likarska Sprava. 2011 Jan-Mar;(1-2):82-9.
3.  Еrmolenko NO, Zarudna OI, Golik IV. Ozhirinnya problema suchasnosti. Мedsestrinstvo. 2016;1:52-6. [in Ukrainian].
4. Mirovaya statistika zdravookhraneniya, 2014. Vsemirnaya organizatsiya zdravookhraneniya. 2014. s. 21-4. [in Russian].
5. Duka YuM. Patohenetychne obhruntuvannya diahnostyky, likuvalnoyi taktyky ta profilaktyky vynyknennya systemnykh porushen u vahitnykh zhinok z nadmirnoyu masoyu tila [dyserttsia]. Kyiv. 2016. 20 s. [in Ukrainian].
6.  Serhiyenko LYu, Perets OV, Kartavtseva OV. Histofunktsionalni osoblyvosti vistseralnoyi zhyrovoyi tkanyny u nashchadkakh hestatsiynostresovanykh osib. Problemy endokrynnoyi patolohiyi. 2010;3:83-9. [in Ukrainian].
7. Tsallahova EV. Ozhyrenye y reproduktyvnaya funktsiya: suchasnyy vzhlyad na problemu. Problemy reproduktsiyi. 2012;4:23-7. [in Russian].
8. Cinti S. Transdifferentiation properties of adipocytes in the adipose organ. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009;297(1):977-86.
9.  Tarasenko KV, Gromova M, Pikul KV, Lysenko RB, Nesterenko LA. Patogenesis of insulin resistance in pregnant women with obesity. Wiadomosti Lekarskie. 2018;LXXI(4):801-6.
10. Dalfrа MG, Pacini G, Parretti E. Тар Elevated insulin sensitivity and β-cell function during pregnancy in mothers of growth-restricted newborns. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011;301(1):25-30.
11. Kryuchko T, Kaidashev I, Pilipenko O, Ostapenko V, Kolenko I. Effect of gene polymorphism of PPR-γ2 regultory proteins on the metabolic syndrome in children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and obesity. Georgian Med News. 2014;4(229):66-73.
12. Netrebenko OK. Prohramuvannya kharchuvannya: ratsion beremennoy zhinky i zdorov’ya potomstva. Pedyatryya. 2012;91(5):49-57. [in Ukrainian].
13. Yajnik CS. Transmission of obesity-adiposity and related disorders from the mother to the baby. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2014;64(1):8-17.
14. Tan HC, Roberts J, Catov J. Mother’s pre-pregnancy BMI is an important determinant of adverse cardiometabolic risk in childhood. Pediatr. Diabetes. 2015;16(6):419-26.
15. Korytko OO. Vplyv nadmirnoyi masy tila ta oriyentatsiyi na fertylnist ta mistse znakhodzhennya. Mizhnarodnyy endokrynolohichnyy zhurnl. 2016;(7):22-6. [in Ukrainian].
16. Hnatko OP. Akusherski ta perynatalni naslidky vahitnosti u zhinok z ozhyrinnyam. Aktulni pytannya pediatriyi, akusherstva ta hinekolohiyi. 2017;1:56-61. [in Ukrainian].
17. Rozhkovska NM, Sytnikova VO. Osoblyvosti fetoplatsentarnoho kompleksu pry ozhyrinni u zhinok. Materialy Vseukrayinsʹkoyi naukovopraktychnoyi konferentsiyi z mizhnarodnoyu uchastyu, prysvyachenoyi 50-richchyu kafedry patolohichnoyi anatomiyi ta kafedry patofiziolohiyi Zaporizʹkoho derzhavnoho medychnoho universytetu. 2015. 81 s. [in Ukrainian].
18. Enquobahrie D, Williams M, Butler CL. Maternal plasma lipid concentration in early pregnancy and risk of preeclampsia. Am. J. Hypertens. 2004;17(7):574-81.
19.  Mittal M, Kulkarni CV, Panchonia, Mittal RK. Evaluation of serum lipid profile in cases of preeclampsia and eclampsia. Int. J. Reprod. Contracept. Obstet. Gynecol. 2014;3(3):732-4.
20.  Ventskivska IB, Aksonov V, Yuzvenko TYu. Rol pokaznykiv lipidohramy protyahom vahitnosti v prohnozuvanni ryzyku rozvytku pre eklampsiyi. Mizhnarodnyy endokrynolohichnyy zhurnal. 2016; 5(77):51-5. [in Ukrainian].
21. Mozgovaya YeV, Malysheva OV, Ivashchenko TE. Endotelial’naya disfunktsiya pri gestoze. Pаtogenez, geneticheskaya predraspolozhennost’, diagnostika i profilaktika: metod. rekomendatsii. Izdatel’stvo: N-L; 2003. 32 s. [in Russian].
22.  Aylamazyan EK, Mostovaya YeV. Gestoz: teoriya i praktika. 2008. 272 s. [in Russian].
23.  Carty DM, Delles C, Dominiczak F. Preeclampsia and future maternal health. J. Hypertens. 2010;l(28):1349-55.
24. Duley L. The global impact of preeclampsia and eclampsia. Semin. Perintol. 2009;33:130-7.
25. Nahornaya VF. Hestozy. Zdorovya Ukrayiny. Tematychnyy vypusk. Akusherstvo i hinekolohiya. 2013. s. 35-7. [in Ukrainian].
26. Ventskovskiy BM, Zaporozhan VN, Senchuk Y, Skachko BG. Gestozy. Moskva: MIA; 2005. 462 s. [in Russian].
27. Kolomiychenko TV, Yarotsoka YuO. Optymizovanyy kompleks zakhodiv profilaktyky preeklampsiyi, spryamovanyy na korektsiyu endotelialnoyi dysfunktsiyi. Reproduktyvna endokrynolohiya. 2015;5(25):88. [in Ukrainian].
28. Uzan J, Carbonnel M, Piconne О. Preeclampsia: pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. Vasc. Health Risk Manag. 2011;l(7):467-74.
29.  Peredmovy, profilaktyka, diahnostyka ta likuvannya hipertenzyvnykh rozladiv vahitnosti: Klinichnyy protokol z akusherskoyi dopomohy. Data skladannya 01.11.2018. [in Ukrainian].
30.  Kvartaskheliy YeYe. Geneticheskaya i priobretennaya trombofilii u patsiyentok s gipertenzivnym sindromom. AG-info. 2006;(4):20-1. [in Russian].
31.  Baranov VS, Ivashchenko TE, Glotov S. Opredeleniye nasledstvennoy predraspolozhennosti k nekotorym chastym zabolevaniyam pri beremennosti. Geneticheskaya karta reproduktivnogo zdorov’ya. Izdatel’stvo: N-L; 2009. 68 s. [in Russian].
32. Strizhakov AN, Ignatko IV, Rybin MV. Printsipy patogeneticheskoy terapii pri narusheniyakh sostoyaniya ploda na fone oslozhnonnogo techeniya beremennosti. Vopr. ginekologii, akusherstva i perinatologii. 2006;5(3):5-14. [in Russian].
33. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Hypertension in pregnancy. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. 2013;122(5):1122-31.
34. Loskutova TO. Taktyka vedennya vahitnykh hrupy ryzyku rozvytku pre eklampsiyi. Medychni perspektyvy. 2015;XX(1):62-9. [in Ukrainian].
35.  Babushkina AB. L-arginin s tochki zreniya dokazatel’noy meditsiny. Ukr. Med. Chasopis. 2009;74(XI/XII):43-8. [in Russian].
36.  Facchinetti F, Sade GR, Neri I. L-arginine supplementation in patients with gestational hypertension: a pilot study. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2007;26(1):121-30.
37.  Rytlewski K, Olszanecki R, Lauterbach R. Effects of oral L-arginine on the fetal condition and neonatal outcome in preeclmpsia: a preliminry report. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2006;99(2):146-52.
38.  Boger RH. The Role of Nitric Oxide Synthase Inhibition by Asymmetric Dimethylarginine in the Pathophysiology of Preeclampsia. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2009;1(69):1-13.
39. Grishchenko OV, Storchak AV, Zinevich YeM. Vozmozhnosti korrektsii gemodinamicheskikh narusheniy pri gestoze putem vosstanovleniya funktsional’noy aktivnosti endoteliy. Zdorov’ye zhenshchiny. 2011;5(61):28-36. [in Russian].
40.  Steegers EA, P von Daleszen, Duvekot JJ, Pijnenborg R. Pre-eclmpsia. Lancet. 2010;376:631-64.
41.  Markin LB, Mykhayliv OO. Osoblyvosti hesattsiynoyi transformatsiyi plodovo-platsentarnoho krovoobihu pry uskladnenomu perebihu vahitnosti. Zdobutky klinichnoyi i eksperymenatlnoyi medytsyny. 2007;1:118-20. [in Ukrainian].
42.  Shatylovyya KL. Systemy maty-platsenta-plid pry preeklampsiyi. Vrachebnoe delo. 2017;8:95-103. [in Ukrainian].
43. Marushchenko YuL. Endotelialna dysfunktsiya u vahitnykh iz preeklmpsiyeyu. Aktualni pytannya pediatriyi, akusherstva ta hinekolohiyi. 2015;2:130-3. [in Ukrainian].
44.  Martynov AI, Avetyak NG, Aktova YeV. Endotelial’naya disfunktsiy i metody yeye opredeleniy. Rossiyskiy kardiologicheskiy zhurnal. 2005;4(54):94-7. [in Russian].
45. Abramchenko VV. Farmakoterapiya gestoza: rukovodstvo dlya vrachey. 2005. 477 s. [in Russian].
46. Semchyshyn RO. Dyferentsiyovana terapiya hestatsiynoyi hipertenziyi [dyserttsia]. Lviv: Lviv. nats. med. un-t Im. D. Galitskogo. 2007. 18 s. [in Ukrainian].
47. Shalina RI, Sharyanova OSh, Vykhristyuk YuV. Tyazholyy gestoz. Blizhayshiye rezul’taty razvitiya detey. Vopr. ginekologii, akusherstva i perinatologii. 2007;6(4):43-8. [in Russian].
48. Golovchenko YuI, Tereshchinskaya M. Obzor sovremennykh predstavleniy ob endotelial’noy disfunktsii. Cons. Med. Ukr. 2008;11:38-40. [in Russian].
49.  Pokrovskiy VI. Oksid azota, yego fiziologicheskiye i patofiziologicheskiye svoystva. Terapevticheskiy arkhiv. 2005;1:82-7. [in Russian].
50.  Matyakubova SA. Korrektsiya disfunktsii endoteliya u zhenshchin gruppy riska razvitiya gestatsionnoy gipertenzii. Arkhiv vnutrenney meditsiny. 2015;3:26-9. [in Russian].
51. Henriques AC, Carvalho FH, Feitosa HN. Endothelial dysfunction after pregnancy induced hypertension. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2014;3(124): 230-4.
52.  Zhabchenko IA, Tsypkun AG, Zhitskiy AM. Rol’ donatorov oksida azota v komplekse lechebnykh meropriyatiy pri preeklampsii. Tavricheskiy mediko-biologicheskiy vestnik. 2012;15(2):137-41. [in Russian].
53. Pijnenborg R, Vercruysse I, Hanssens M, Brosens I. Endovasculr trofoblast and preeclampsia: Areassessment. Pregnancy Hypertention. An Internationl Journal of Women’s Cardiovascular Helth. 2011;1(1):66-71.
54. Antypkin YuH, Honcharenko NI, Tarasyuk BA. Lazerna dopplerivska floumetriya u doslidzhenni endotelialnoyi funktsiyi u ditey z bronkhialnoyu astmoyu. Zhurnal AMN Ukrayiny. 2010;2(16);307-12. [in Ukrainian].
55. Daneva AM, Hadzi-Lega M, Stefanovic M. Correlation of the system of cytokines in moderate and severe preeclampsia. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2016;43(2):220-4.
56. Elliot MG. Oxidative stress and the evolutionary origins of preeclmpsia. J Reprod Immunol. 2016;114:75-80.
57. Hladunewich M, Karumanchi SA, Lafayette R. Pathophysiology of the clinical manifestations of preeclampsia. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;2:543-9.
58.  Erez O, Mastrolia SA, Thachil J. Disseminated intravascular coagulation in pregnancy: insights in pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(4):452-63.
59.  Sergeeva ON, Chesnokova NP, Ponukalina EV. Pathogenetic relationship between endothelial dysfunctiona and disorders of blood cogulation potential in pregnancy complicated by pre-eclampsia. Herald of RAMN. 2015;5:599-603.
60.  Rudkov YeB, Besmn IV. Vspomogatel’nyye reproduktivnyye tekhnologii. Problemy poter’ beremennosti. Lechashchiy vrach. 2010;3:46-8. [in Russian].
61. Granne I, Southcombe JH, Snider JV. ST2 and IL-33 in Pregnancy and PreEclmpsia. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):244-63.
62. Yermolov SYu, Radchenko VG, Shatrov AV. Disfunktsiya endoteliya pechenochnykh gemokapillyarov: otsenka i korrektsiya gemodinamiki v terapii khronicheskikh zabolevaniy pecheni. 2000. 117 s. [in Russian].
63.  Ahapov YA, Sadchykov DV, Paryhorodov MV. Patohenez hestoza. Saratovskyy nauchno-medytsynskyy zhurnal. 2011;7(4):813-6. [in Russian].
64.  Sydorova YS, Nykytyna NA. Preeklmpsyya v tsentre vnymanyya vracha-praktyky. Akusherstvo y hynekolohyya. 2014;6:4-9. [in Russian].
65.  Sukhykh HT, Murashko LE. Preéklampsyya: rukovodstvo. 2010. 576 s. [in Russian].
66.  Sydorova IS, Zayrtyants IS, Nykytyna N. Hestoz y materynskaya smertnost. Akusherstvo y hynekolohyya. 2008;2:13-5. [in Russian].
67. Hureev VV. Endotelyalʹnaya dysfunktsyya – tsentralnоe zveno v patoheneze hestoza. Nauchnye vedomosty Belhorodskoho hosudarstvennoho unyversyteta. Medytsyna. Farmatsiya. 2012;17(4):123. [in Russian].
68. Bloshchynskaya YA. Rolʹ osnovnykh vazoaktyvnykh faktoriv sosudystoho endoteliyu v rozvytku hestozu. Roscyyskyy vestnyk akusherahinekoloha. 2003;3(4):7-10. [in Russian].
69.  Mushak NI. Akushersʹki ta perynatalni uskladnennya u vahitniy iz arterialʹnoyu hipertenziyeyu do yodnoho defitsytu (ohlyad literatury). Semeynaya medytsyna. 2017;5(73):118-28. [in Ukrainian].
70.  Efektyvnyy antenatalnyy dohlyad: navchalnyy posibnyk. 2012. 507 s. [in Ukrainian].
71. Sukhykh HT, Vykhlyaev EM, Vanko LV. Éndotelyalnaya dysfunktsyyaa v heneze perynatalnoyi patolohiyi. Akusherstvo y hynekolohyya. 2008;5:3- 7. [in Russian].
72.  Vatten LJ, Asvold BO, Eskild A. Angiogenic factors in maternal circulation and preeclampsia with or without fetal growth restriction. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91:1388-94.
73.  Pal’tsev M, Volkova L, Pal’tseva Ye, Alyautdina O. Otsenka sostoyaniya sosudistogo endoteliya pri razlichnykh akusherskikh patologiyakh. Vrach. 2011;5:86-7. [in Russian].

«Bulletin of problems biology and medicine» Issue 1 Part 2 (149), 2019 year, 34-40 pages, index UDK 618.2-056.5:611.018.74

10.29254/2077-4214-2019-1-2-149-34-40